Chinese herbal medicine (Rupi Sanjie capsule) for the treatment of breast pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

被引:2
作者
Lai, Bao-Yong [1 ]
Jia, Li-Yan [2 ]
Yu, Bo -Wen [1 ]
Liang, Shi-Bing [3 ]
Chu, Ai-Jing [1 ]
Cao, Hui -Juan [3 ]
Liu, Jian-Ping [3 ]
Pei, Xiao-Hua [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Ctr Evidence Based Chinese Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Fangshan Hosp Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Herbal medicine; Breast pain; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review; Meta-Analysis; MANAGEMENT; MASTALGIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.imr.2020.100491
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Breast pain is one of the most common breast disorders, affecting 41%-69% women in the clinical populations. Chinese herbal medicine (Rupi Sanjie, RPSJ) capsule has been recommended to be commonly used for breast pain in China. This review aimed to systematically collect latest evidence and critically evaluate the eff;ectiveness and safety of RPSJ capsule for breast pain. Methods: We searched 6 databases from their inception to June 1, 2020 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing RPSJ capsule with conventional drug therapies, placebo or no treatment. Primary outcomes were breast pain relief, reduction of breast mass and clinical cure rate. Results: Seventeen RCTs were included in total, involving 2899 participants with breast pain. RPSJ capsule showed a significant effects in shortening duration of the breast pain (MD-6.51 days, 95%CI [-8.57, -4.45], n = 82, 1 trial), shortening the duration of breast mass (MD-5.17 days, 95%CI [-7.56, -2.78], n = 82, 1 trial), improving clinical cure rate (RR 1.55, 95% CI [1.21, 2.00], I2 = 64%, n = 1398, 10 trials) and total effective rate (RR 1.08, 95% CI [1.03, 1.14], I-2 = 71%, n = 2170, 14 trials) compared to Tamoxifen (TAM). The meta-analysis showed that the incidence of total adverse events was higher in TAM group than the RPSJ capsule group (RR 0.30, 95%CI [0.21, 0.42], I-2 = 49%, n = 2122, 13 trials). Conclusions: RPSJ capsule appears to be a potentially effective in treating breast pain and seems generally safe for clinical application. However, this potential benefit is inconclusive due to generally weak evidence, and the findings should be further confirmed in large and rigorous trials. (C) 2020 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Chen HB, 2013, CHIN J PRIM MED PHAR, V20, P3871
  • [2] Chen WC, 2014, J N PHARM, V11, P52
  • [3] Chinese pharmacopoeia commission, 2010, CHINESE PHARMACOPOEI, V2010th, P841
  • [4] Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:, 2018, J Am Coll Radiol, V15, pS276, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.014
  • [5] Fan HT, 2015, ELECT J CLIN MED LIT, V2, P2202
  • [6] GATELEY CA, 1992, J ROY SOC MED, V85, P12
  • [7] Goyal A, 2016, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V93, P872
  • [8] Cyclic and non-cyclic breast-pain: A systematic review on pain reduction, side effects, and quality of life for various treatments
    Groen, Jan-Willem
    Grosfeld, Sissi
    Bramer, Wichor M.
    Ernst, Miranda F.
    Mullender, Magriet M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 219 : 74 - 93
  • [9] Han F, 2018, SHANDONG MED J, V58, P69
  • [10] Han M., 1988, CHINA J TRAD CHIN ME, V3, P66