A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment

被引:59
作者
Barakat, RR
Almadrones, L
Venkatraman, ES
Aghajanian, C
Brown, C
Shapiro, F
Curtin, JP
Spriggs, D
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Gynecol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Dev Chemotherapy Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1998.4973
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. To determine the efficacy of three courses of intraperitoneal (ip) cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16) as consolidation therapy following pathologically negative second-look surgical reassessment for Stage IIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods. Between September 1988 and April 1996, 40 patients were treated with three cycles of ip CDDP (100 mg/ m(2))VP-16 (200 mg/m(2)) as consolidation therapy. Survival was compared to that of a group of 46 contemporaneous patients undergoing observation only. Results. Median age of the 36 eligible patients was 52 years (range 30-70 years). Stage distribution was II (3), III (31), and IV (2); histologic grade was 1 (2), 2 (7), 3 (25), and not recorded (2); and residual disease at completion of initial surgery was none/ microscopic in 13/36 (36%) patients. Median age of the 46 patients who did not receive consolidation was 52 years (range, 27-80 years); stage distribution was II (18), III (26), and IV (2); histologic grade was 1 (5), 2 (12), 3 (28), and not recorded (1). With a median follow-up of 36 months in both groups, 14/36 (39%) of the protocol group have recurred compared with 25/46 (54%) of those undergoing observation alone, Median disease-free survival (DFS) for the observed patients is 28.5 months and has not been reached in the consolidation group. Disease-free survival distribution between the two groups was compared using the log-rank test and was found to be significant (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that the only significant predictor of improved DFS was protocol treatment (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Intraperitoneal consolidation with CDDP/VP-16 following negative second-look reassessment in patients with advanced EOC resulted in a significant increase in DFS compared to nonprotocol patients treated concurrently who underwent observation alone. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 22
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Second-look operation for epithelial ovarian cancer: Laparoscopy or laparotomy? [J].
AbuRustum, NR ;
Barakat, RR ;
Siegel, PL ;
Venkatraman, E ;
Curtin, JP ;
Hoskins, WJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) :549-553
[2]  
ALBERTS DS, 1996, NEW ENGL J MED, V335, P1
[3]   A REVIEW OF 2ND-LOOK LAPAROTOMY FOR OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
CAIN, JM ;
SAIGO, PE ;
PIERCE, VK ;
CLARK, DG ;
JONES, WB ;
SMITH, DH ;
HAKES, TB ;
OCHOA, M ;
LEWIS, JL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1986, 23 (01) :14-25
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]   SURVIVAL WITH INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CANCER AFTER 2ND-LOOK LAPAROTOMY [J].
DEGRAMONT, A ;
DEMUYNCK, B ;
LOUVET, C ;
GONZALEZCANALI, G ;
VARETTE, C ;
PIGNE, A ;
MARPEAU, L ;
HERBULOT, P ;
LAGADEC, B ;
CADY, J ;
SOUBRANE, D ;
COUTURIER, JY ;
DELFAU, S ;
SEZEUR, A ;
GALLOT, D ;
MALAFOSSE, M ;
BARRAT, J ;
KRULIK, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1992, 15 (01) :7-11
[6]  
DUFOUR P, 1991, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, V12, P457
[7]  
DUFOUR P, 1994, CANCER, V73, P1865, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940401)73:7<1865::AID-CNCR2820730715>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-T
[9]   CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AND SURGICAL INDUCTION OF PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE REMISSION AND WHOLE ABDOMINAL IRRADIATION FOR CONSOLIDATION DOES NOT ENHANCE THE CURE OF STAGE-III OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
FUKS, Z ;
RIZEL, S ;
BIRAN, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (03) :509-516
[10]   RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF 5 VERSUS 10 CYCLES OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND CISPLATIN IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
HAKES, TB ;
CHALAS, E ;
HOSKINS, WJ ;
JONES, WB ;
MARKMAN, M ;
RUBIN, SC ;
CHAPMAN, D ;
ALMADRONES, L ;
LEWIS, JL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 45 (03) :284-289