Perception of corruption and public support for redistribution in Latin America

被引:12
作者
Hauk, Esther [1 ]
Oviedo, Monica [2 ,3 ]
Ramos, Xavier [4 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Move & Barcelona Sch Econ, Inst Anal Econ IAE, Campus UAB, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[2] UPF, TecnoCampus, Mataro 08302, Barcelona, Spain
[3] UPF, EQUALITAS, Escola Super Ciencies Socials & Empresa, TecnoCampus, Mataro 08302, Barcelona, Spain
[4] UAB, Dept Econ Aplicada, IZA & EQUALITAS, Fac Econ & Empresa, Barcelona 08193, Spain
关键词
Preference for redistribution; Corruption perceptions; Political trust; Bribery; Latin America; BIVARIATE PROBIT MODELS; SOCIAL-POLICY; INCOME-REDISTRIBUTION; WELFARE-STATE; PREFERENCES; INEQUALITY; TRUST; IDENTIFICATION; EXPLANATION; INSECURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102174
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the relationship between people's beliefs about the quality of their insti-tutions, as measured by corruption perceptions, and preferences for redistribution in Latin America. Our empirical study is guided by a theoretical model which introduces taxes into Foellmi and Oechslin's (2007) general equilibrium model of non-collusive corruption. In this model perceived corruption influences people's preferences for redistribution through two channels. On the one hand it undermines trust in government, which reduces people's support for redistribution. On the other hand, more corruption decreases own wealth relative to average wealth of below-average-wealth individuals leading to a higher demand for redistribution. Thus, the effect of perceived corruption on redistribution cannot be signed a priori. Our novel empirical findings for Latin America suggest that perceiving corruption in the public sector increases people's support for redistribution. Although the wealth channel dominates in the data, we also find evidence for the trust channel - from corruption to demand for redistribution via reduced trust.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[11]  
Arellano M., 2007, CLASS NOTES CEMFI
[12]   How much income redistribution? An explanation based on vote-buying and corruption [J].
Balafoutas, Loukas .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2011, 146 (1-2) :185-203
[13]   Historical Trust Levels Predict the Current Size of the Welfare State [J].
Bergh, Andreas ;
Bjornskov, Christian .
KYKLOS, 2011, 64 (01) :1-19
[14]   Tax Effort in Developing Countries and High Income Countries: The Impact of Corruption, Voice and Accountability [J].
Bird, Richard M. ;
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge ;
Torgler, Benno .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2008, 38 (01) :55-71
[15]   Does social trust determine the size of the welfare state? Evidence using historical identification [J].
Bjornskov, Christian ;
Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2013, 157 (1-2) :269-286
[16]   Social capital and preferences for redistribution to target groups [J].
Borisova, Ekaterina ;
Govorun, Andrei ;
Ivanov, Denis ;
Levina, Irina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 54 :56-67
[17]   A Practitioner's Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference [J].
Cameron, A. Colin ;
Miller, Douglas L. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2015, 50 (02) :317-372
[18]   Does Trust Influence Social Expenditures? Evidence from Local Governments [J].
Camussi, Silvia ;
Mancini, Anna Laura ;
Tommasino, Pietro .
KYKLOS, 2018, 71 (01) :59-85
[19]   Opting Out of the Social Contract: Tax Morale and Evasion [J].
Castaneda, Nestor ;
Doyle, David ;
Schwartz, Cassilde .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2020, 53 (07) :1175-1219
[20]   Individual preferences for political redistribution [J].
Corneo, G ;
Grüner, HP .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2002, 83 (01) :83-107