Predictive Utility of an Emergency Department Decision Support Tool in Patients With Active Suicidal Ideation

被引:15
|
作者
Boudreaux, Edwin D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larkin, Celine [1 ]
Kini, Nisha [3 ,12 ]
Capoccia, Lisa [4 ]
Allen, Michael H. [5 ]
Grumet, Julie Goldstein [4 ]
Silverman, Morton M. [4 ]
McKeon, Richard [6 ]
Barton, Bruce [3 ]
Miller, Ivan [7 ,8 ]
Formica, Scott W. [9 ]
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[4] Educ Dev Ctr, Waltham, MA USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Subst Abuse & Mental Hlth Serv Adm, Rockville, MD USA
[7] Brown Univ, Brown Med Sch, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[8] Butler Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[9] Social Sci Res & Evaluat Inc, Burlington, MA USA
[10] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[11] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[12] Terumo Europe NV, European Med & Clin Div, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
emergency department; suicide; decision support; prediction; RISK;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000236
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Emergency department (ED) clinicians routinely decide the disposition of patients with suicidal ideation, with potential consequences for patient safety, liability, and system costs and resources. An expert consensus panel recently created a 6-item decision support tool for patients with passive or active suicidal ideation. Individuals scoring a 0 (exhibiting none of the tool's 6 items) are considered "lower risk" and suitable for discharge, while those with non-0 scores are considered "elevated risk" and should receive further evaluation. The current study tested the predictive utility of this tool using existing data from the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation. ED patients with active suicide ideation (n = 1368) were followed for 12 months after an index visit using telephone assessment and medical chart review. About 1 in 5 patients had attempted suicide during follow-up. Because of the frequency of serious warning signs and risk factors in this population, only three patients met tool criteria for "lower risk" at baseline. The tool had perfect sensitivity, but exceptionally low specificity, in predicting suicidal behavior within 6 weeks and 12 months. In logistic regressoion analyses, several tool items were significantly associated with suicidal behavior within 6 weeks (suicide plan, past attempt) and 12 months (suicide plan, past attempt, suicide intent, significant mental health condition, irritability/agitation/aggression). Although the tool did not perform well as a binary instrument among those with active suicidal ideation, having a suicide plan identified almost all attempters while suicide plan and past attempt identified over four-fifths of near-term attempts.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 278
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] UTILITY OF OBSERVATION UNITS FOR YOUNG EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT CHEST PAIN PATIENTS
    Ely, Sora
    Chandra, Abhinav
    Mani, Giselle
    Drake, Weiying
    Freeman, Debbie
    Limkakeng, Alexander T., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (02) : 306 - 312
  • [32] The Utility of Inflammatory and Endothelial Markers to Identify Infection in Emergency Department Patients
    Day, Danielle E.
    Oedorf, Kimie
    Kogan, Slava
    Novack, Victor
    Sanchez, Leon D.
    Wolfe, Richard E.
    Shapiro, Nathan I.
    Henning, Daniel J.
    SHOCK, 2015, 44 (03): : 215 - 220
  • [33] Association between suicidal ideation and behavior, and depression, anxiety, and perceived social support in cancer patients
    Sengul, Melike Ceyhan Balci
    Kaya, Vildan
    Sen, Cenk Ahmet
    Kaya, Kemal
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2014, 20
  • [34] Trends in Suicidal Ideation-Related Emergency Department Visits for Youth in Illinois: 2016-2021
    Brewer, Audrey G.
    Doss, William
    Sheehan, Karen M.
    Davis, Matthew M.
    Feinglass, Joseph M.
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 150 (06)
  • [35] Hospital Emergency Department Lethal Means Counseling for Suicidal Patients
    Runyan, Carol W.
    Brooks-Russell, Ashley
    Tung, Gregory
    Brandspigel, Sara
    Betz, Marian E.
    Novins, Douglas K.
    Agans, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (02) : 259 - 265
  • [36] Interventions to prevent repeat suicidal behavior in patients admitted to an emergency department for a suicide attempt: A meta-analysis
    Inagaki, Masatoshi
    Kawashima, Yoshitaka
    Kawanishi, Chiaki
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    Sugimoto, Tatsuya
    Furuno, Taku
    Ikeshita, Katsumi
    Eto, Nobuaki
    Tachikawa, Hirokazu
    Shiraishi, Yohko
    Yamada, Mitsuhiko
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 175 : 66 - 78
  • [37] Importance of Decision Support Implementation in Emergency Department Vancomycin Dosing
    Faine, Brett
    Mohr, Nicholas
    Harland, Kari K.
    Rolfes, Kathryn
    Porter, Blake
    Fuller, Brian M.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (04) : 557 - 564
  • [38] Psychosocial Correlates of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Adolescents and Preadolescent Children Discharged from an Emergency Department in Israel
    Shahnovsky, Oren
    Pirogovsky, Lior
    Toukhy, Nermin
    Akhavan, Shannel
    Hergas, Dana Grisaru
    Apter, Alan
    Haruvi-Catalan, Liat
    Benaroya-Milshtein, Noa
    Fennig, Silvana
    Barzilay, Shira
    ARCHIVES OF SUICIDE RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [39] Academic Medical Center Visits by Adolescents Preceding Emergency Department Care for Suicidal Ideation or Suicide Attempt
    Sarin, Arjun
    Conners, Gregory P.
    Sullivant, Shayla
    Giovanni, Joan
    Sherman, Ashley
    Zanaboni, Christina
    Randell, Kimberly A.
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2021, 21 (07) : 1218 - 1222
  • [40] A hybrid model to support decision making in emergency department management
    Pegoraro, Fabio
    Portela Santos, Eduardo Alves
    Rocha Loures, Eduardo de Freitas
    Laus, Fernanda Wanka
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 203 (203)