Predictive Utility of an Emergency Department Decision Support Tool in Patients With Active Suicidal Ideation

被引:15
|
作者
Boudreaux, Edwin D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larkin, Celine [1 ]
Kini, Nisha [3 ,12 ]
Capoccia, Lisa [4 ]
Allen, Michael H. [5 ]
Grumet, Julie Goldstein [4 ]
Silverman, Morton M. [4 ]
McKeon, Richard [6 ]
Barton, Bruce [3 ]
Miller, Ivan [7 ,8 ]
Formica, Scott W. [9 ]
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, 55 Lake Ave, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[4] Educ Dev Ctr, Waltham, MA USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Subst Abuse & Mental Hlth Serv Adm, Rockville, MD USA
[7] Brown Univ, Brown Med Sch, Dept Psychiat & Human Behav, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[8] Butler Hosp, Providence, RI 02906 USA
[9] Social Sci Res & Evaluat Inc, Burlington, MA USA
[10] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[11] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[12] Terumo Europe NV, European Med & Clin Div, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
emergency department; suicide; decision support; prediction; RISK;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000236
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Emergency department (ED) clinicians routinely decide the disposition of patients with suicidal ideation, with potential consequences for patient safety, liability, and system costs and resources. An expert consensus panel recently created a 6-item decision support tool for patients with passive or active suicidal ideation. Individuals scoring a 0 (exhibiting none of the tool's 6 items) are considered "lower risk" and suitable for discharge, while those with non-0 scores are considered "elevated risk" and should receive further evaluation. The current study tested the predictive utility of this tool using existing data from the Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation. ED patients with active suicide ideation (n = 1368) were followed for 12 months after an index visit using telephone assessment and medical chart review. About 1 in 5 patients had attempted suicide during follow-up. Because of the frequency of serious warning signs and risk factors in this population, only three patients met tool criteria for "lower risk" at baseline. The tool had perfect sensitivity, but exceptionally low specificity, in predicting suicidal behavior within 6 weeks and 12 months. In logistic regressoion analyses, several tool items were significantly associated with suicidal behavior within 6 weeks (suicide plan, past attempt) and 12 months (suicide plan, past attempt, suicide intent, significant mental health condition, irritability/agitation/aggression). Although the tool did not perform well as a binary instrument among those with active suicidal ideation, having a suicide plan identified almost all attempters while suicide plan and past attempt identified over four-fifths of near-term attempts.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 278
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A decision support tool for emergency management planning
    Wang, Haibo
    Alidaee, Bahrani
    Altinakar, Mustafa
    International Conference on Management Innovation, Vols 1 and 2, 2007, : 34 - 40
  • [22] Emergency Department Visits for Non-suicidal Self-harm, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicide Attempts in Children and Adolescents
    Onur Tuğçe Poyraz Fındık
    Ayşe Burcu Erdoğdu
    Eray Fadıloğlu
    Ayşe Rodopman Arman
    Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2022, 53 : 289 - 299
  • [23] Assessing psychiatric safety in suicidal emergency department patients
    Brenner, Jay M.
    Marco, Catherine A.
    Kluesner, Nicholas H.
    Schears, Raquel M.
    Martin, Daniel R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2020, 1 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [24] Development and Testing of an Emergency Department Quality Measure for Pediatric Suicidal Ideation and Self-Harm
    Parast, Layla
    Burkhart, Q.
    Bardach, Naomi S.
    Thombley, Robert
    Basco, William T., Jr.
    Barabell, Greg
    Williams, Derek J.
    Mitchel, Ed
    Machado, Edison, Jr.
    Raghavan, Priya
    Tolpadi, Anagha
    Mangione-Smith, Rita
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2021, 22 (03) : S92 - S99
  • [25] A support framework for decision making in emergency department management
    Pegoraro, Fabio
    Portela Santos, Eduardo Alves
    Rocha Loures, Eduardo de Freitas
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146
  • [26] Suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and psychological distress among intoxicated adolescents in the pediatric emergency department
    Puuskari, Varpu
    Aalto-Setala, Terhi
    Komulainen, Erkki
    Marttunen, Mauri
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 72 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [27] Parent-Adolescent Acculturation Gap and Suicidal Ideation among Adolescents from an Emergency Department
    Ortin, Ana
    Miranda, Regina
    Polanco-Roman, Lillian
    Shaffer, David
    ARCHIVES OF SUICIDE RESEARCH, 2018, 22 (04) : 529 - 541
  • [28] Demoralization and Its Relationship with Depression and Hopelessness in Suicidal Patients Attending an Emergency Department
    Costanza, Alessandra
    Baertschi, Marc
    Richard-Lepouriel, Helene
    Weber, Kerstin
    Berardelli, Isabella
    Pompili, Maurizio
    Canuto, Alessandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (07)
  • [29] Behavioral Health Decision Support Systems and User Interface Design in the Emergency Department
    Jones, Nicholas W.
    Song, Sophia L.
    Thomasian, Nicole
    Samuels, Elizabeth A.
    Ranney, Megan L.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 14 (04): : 705 - 713
  • [30] The Use of Rapid COVID-19 Antigen Test in the Emergency Department as a Decision-Support Tool
    Meltzer, Lilac
    Amit, Sharon
    Gilboa, Mayan
    Tal, Ilana
    Mechnik, Bella
    Irony, Avi
    Engelrad, Hindi
    Epstein, Avi
    Frenkel-Nir, Yael
    Levy, Yuval
    Kreiss, Yitshak
    Regev-Yochay, Gili
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (02)