Comparative efficacy of biological and chemical control of the vegetative reproduction in Betula papyrifera and Prunus pensylvanica

被引:24
作者
Jobidon, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Minist Ressources Nat Quebec, Direct Rech Forestiere, St Foy, PQ G1P 3W8, Canada
关键词
basidiomycetes; bialaphos; Chondrostereum purpureum; competing vegetation; biological weed control; glyphosate; forest;
D O I
10.1006/bcon.1997.0573
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of various treatments to control stump sprouting of Betula papyrifera and Prunus pensylvanica was examined under field conditions in Quebec. The experiment involved six stump sprouting-control treatments organized in a randomized complete block design with 15 repetitions: two isolates of the indigenous fungus Chondrostereum purpureum (biological control), a heat-killed blank of the inoculum of C. purpureum, bialaphos (biorational control), glyphosate (chemical control), and the untreated control. Control of stump sprouting was evaluated 1 and 2 years after treatment by the proportion of stumps with living sprouts and by the mean number of Living and dead sprouts per stump. One and 2 years after treatment, biological control was comparable to chemical control in terms of frequency of sprouting and mean number of sprouts per stump, for B. papyrifera. While the two fungal isolates affected stump sprouting in B. papyrifera similarly, P. pensylvanica showed two significantly different responses, suggesting that virulence could vary among isolates of C. purpureum, particularly for less susceptible species. One year after treatment with C. purpureum, an infection analysis was performed to assess the extent of colonization within the stumps of both species. Results suggest that the extent of colonization was not related to the level of control of stump sprouting. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*CAN CLIM PROGR, 1993, CAN CLIM NORM 1961 9
[2]  
Canada Soil Survey Committee Subcommittee on Soil Classification, 1978, Publ, V1646
[3]   RISK ANALYSIS APPLIED TO BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL OF A FOREST WEED, USING THE GAUSSIAN PLUME MODEL [J].
DEJONG, MD ;
SCHEEPENS, PC ;
ZADOKS, JC .
GRANA, 1990, 29 (02) :139-145
[4]   RISK ANALYSIS FOR BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL - A DUTCH CASE-STUDY IN BIOCONTROL OF PRUNUS-SEROTINA BY THE FUNGUS CHONDROSTEREUM-PURPUREUM [J].
DEJONG, MD ;
SCHEEPENS, PC .
PLANT DISEASE, 1990, 74 (03) :189-194
[5]  
DEJONG MD, 1991, NETH J PLANT PATHOL, V97, P55, DOI 10.1007/BF01995783
[6]  
ETHERIDGE D. E., 1963, CANADIAN JOUR BOT, V41, P1532, DOI 10.1139/b63-134
[7]   Assessment of genetic variation within Chondrostereum purpureum from Quebec by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis [J].
Gosselin, L ;
Jobidon, R ;
Bernier, L .
MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 100 :151-158
[8]   SOME FUTURE-DIRECTIONS FOR BIOLOGICALLY BASED VEGETATION CONTROL IN FORESTRY RESEARCH [J].
JOBIDON, R .
FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1991, 67 (05) :514-519
[10]  
Jobidon R., 1991, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, V8, P147