Juvenile justice sentencing: Do gender and child welfare involvement matter?

被引:11
作者
Tam, Christina C. [1 ]
Abrams, Laura S. [1 ]
Freisthler, Bridget [1 ]
Ryan, Joseph P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Social Welf, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Juvenile justice; Sentencing disparities; Gender; Child welfare; Crossover youth; FOSTER-CARE; NEIGHBORHOOD DISADVANTAGE; DELINQUENCY; PLACEMENT; GIRLS; PERSPECTIVES; MALTREATMENT; RACE; DISPARITIES; OFFENDERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.02.028
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
For young people who come into contact with the juvenile justice system, how they are sentenced following an arrest may profoundly influence the course of their development and adjustment as adults. Much of the research to date has focused on racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile justice sentencing policies and practices, and less is known about sentencing disparities based on other youth characteristics. Using Los Angeles County administrative data, this study investigates the effects of gender and child welfare statuses on sentencing for young people who are arrested for the first time (N = 5061). Results indicate that both young men and women are sentenced more harshly dependent upon the disposition, such that girls were more likely to be sentenced to group homes compared to boys, but boys were more likely to be sentenced to correctional facilities compared to girls. Child welfare-involved youth with a recent placement history are prone to more punitive sentences compared to their non-child welfare counterparts. Further, child welfare young women were not more likely to be sentenced to a harsher disposition compared to child welfare young men or non-child welfare young women. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Guardians of virtue: The social reformers and the "girl problem," 1890-1920 [J].
Abrams, LS .
SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2000, 74 (03) :436-452
[2]   Wayward girls and virtuous women: Social workers and female juvenile delinquency in the progressive era [J].
Abrams, LS ;
Curran, L .
AFFILIA-JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND SOCIAL WORK, 2000, 15 (01) :49-64
[3]  
Alexander M., 2020, NEW JIM CROW MASS IN
[4]   Differences in children's construction of gender across culture - An interpretive approach [J].
Aydt, H ;
Corsaro, WA .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2003, 46 (10) :1306-1325
[5]  
Bernstein N., 2014, BURNING HOUSE END JU
[6]  
BISHOP DM, 2005, OUR CHILDREN THEIR C
[7]   GENDER BIAS IN JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCESSING - IMPLICATIONS OF THE JJDP ACT [J].
BISHOP, DM ;
FRAZIER, CE .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY, 1992, 82 (04) :1162-1186
[8]  
Bishop DM, 2006, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, P3
[9]   Contexts of Decision Making in the Juvenile Justice System: An Organizational Approach to Understanding Minority Overrepresentation [J].
Bishop, Donna M. ;
Leiber, Michael ;
Johnson, Joseph .
YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE, 2010, 8 (03) :213-233
[10]   The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children's affiliation with deviant peers [J].
Brody, GH ;
Ge, XJ ;
Conger, R ;
Gibbons, FX ;
Murry, VM ;
Gerrard, M ;
Simons, RL .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 72 (04) :1231-1246