When the fire dies: Perceived success and support for innovation shape the motivating potential of innovative work behaviour

被引:20
作者
Devloo, Toon [1 ]
Anseel, Frederik [1 ]
De Beuckelaer, Alain [2 ]
Feys, Marjolein [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management Work & Org Psychol, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, Thomas van Aquinostr 3-2-11,POB 9108, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
innovative work behaviour; perceived success; support for innovation; basic need satisfaction; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; NEED SATISFACTION; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; FAIRNESS PERCEPTIONS; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; CONTEXTUAL FACTORS; JOB-PERFORMANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; PERSPECTIVE; AUTONOMY;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2016.1182157
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In recent years, there seems to have grown a perspective in the literature that innovation will have uniformly positive outcomes for individuals and organizations. This is unfortunate as innovative individuals may not always experience the assumed positive motivational consequences of being innovative at work. Our study aims to examine under which conditions engaging in innovative work behaviour (IWB) may not leads to desired motivational outcomes. We conducted a longitudinal field study involving 100 industrial product design and electronic engineering students participating for 7days in an innovation boot camp. In support of our hypotheses, we found that day-level IWB leads to higher basic need satisfaction at the subsequent day when perceived success and support for innovation were high. However, when these moderators were low, the hypothesized relationship became non-significant. Our study results yield useful suggestions for helping individuals in maintaining optimal motivation throughout innovation processes.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 524
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[3]   The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science [J].
Anderson, N ;
De Dreu, CKW ;
Nijstad, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) :147-173
[4]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[5]   Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback [J].
Anseel, Frederik ;
Lievens, Filip ;
Schollaert, Eveline .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2009, 110 (01) :23-35
[6]   Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas [J].
Axtell, CM ;
Holman, DJ ;
Unsworth, KL ;
Wall, TD ;
Waterson, PE .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 :265-285
[7]   The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity [J].
Baer, Markus ;
Oldham, Greg R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (04) :963-970
[8]   Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt [J].
Baer, Markus ;
Brown, Graham .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2012, 118 (01) :60-71
[9]  
Bandura Albert, 1999, Self-efficacy, V13, P158, DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
[10]   The impact of feedback from job and task autonomy in the relationship between dispositional resistance to change and innovative work behaviour [J].
Battistelli, Adalgisa ;
Montani, Francesco ;
Odoardi, Carlo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 22 (01) :26-41