Discovering new indicators of fecal pollution

被引:137
|
作者
McLellan, Sandra L. [1 ]
Eren, A. Murat [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Freshwater Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
[2] Marine Biol Lab, Josephine Bay Paul Ctr, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
关键词
sewage; fecal indicators; alternative indicators; water quality; next-generation sequencing; microbial communities; oligotyping; MICROBIAL SOURCE TRACKING; REAL-TIME PCR; GENETIC-MARKERS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; QUANTITATIVE PCR; GUT MICROBIOME; SEWAGE CONTAMINATION; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; HOST-SPECIFICITY; NONPOINT SOURCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tim.2014.08.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Fecal pollution indicators are essential to identify and remediate contamination sources and protect public health. Historically, easily cultured facultative anaerobes such as fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli, or enterococci have been used but these indicators generally provide no information as to their source. More recently, molecular methods have targeted fecal anaerobes, which are much more abundant in humans and other mammals, and some strains appear to be associated with particular host sources. Next-generation sequencing and microbiome studies have created an unprecedented inventory of microbial communities associated with fecal sources, allowing reexamination of which taxonomic groups are best suited as informative indicators. The use of new computational methods, such as oligotyping coupled with well-established machine learning approaches, is providing new insights into patterns of host association. In this review we examine the basis for host-specificity and the rationale for using 16S rRNA gene targets for alternative indicators and highlight two taxonomic groups, Bacteroidales and Lachnospiraceae, which are rich in host-specific bacterial organisms. Finally, we discuss considerations for using alternative indicators for water quality assessments with a particular focus on detecting human sewage sources of contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Portable platform for rapid in-field identification of human fecal pollution in water
    Jiang, Yu Sherry
    Riedel, Timothy E.
    Popoola, Jessica A.
    Morrow, Barrett R.
    Cai, Sheng
    Ellington, Andrew D.
    Bhadra, Sanchita
    WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 131 : 186 - 195
  • [22] Prevalence and abundance of traditional and host-associated fecal indicators in urban estuarine sediments: Potential implications for estuarine water quality monitoring
    Ahmed, Warish
    Payyappat, Sudhi
    Cassidy, Michele
    Harrison, Nathan
    Marinoni, Oswald
    Besley, Colin
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 184
  • [23] Quantitative fecal pollution assessment with bacterial, viral, and molecular methods in small stream tributaries
    McMinn, Brian R.
    Korajkic, Asja
    Kelleher, Julie
    Diedrich, Adam
    Pemberton, Adin
    Willis, Jessica R.
    Sivaganesan, Mano
    Shireman, Brooke
    Doyle, Andrew
    Shanks, Orin C.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 951
  • [24] Evaluation of the viability of using coliphages as indicators of fecal pollution: relations with physical and chemical parameters and bacterial indicators
    de Almeida Silva, Maria Cristina
    Monteggia, Luiz Olinto
    Schiavo Miranda, Luis Alcides
    Thewes, Marcia Regina
    ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2015, 20 (04) : 645 - 652
  • [25] Fecal pollution: new trends and challenges in microbial source tracking using next-generation sequencing
    Unno, Tatsuya
    Staley, Christopher
    Brown, Clairessa M.
    Han, Dukki
    Sadowsky, Michael J.
    Hur, Hor-Gil
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 20 (09) : 3132 - 3140
  • [26] CrAssphage for fecal source tracking in Chile: Covariation with norovirus, HF183, and bacterial indicators
    Jennings, Wiley C.
    Galvez-Arango, Elias
    Prieto, Ana L.
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    WATER RESEARCH X, 2020, 9
  • [27] Lachnospiraceae and Bacteroidales Alternative Fecal Indicators Reveal Chronic Human Sewage Contamination in an Urban Harbor
    Newton, Ryan J.
    VandeWalle, Jessica L.
    Borchardt, Mark A.
    Gorelick, Marc H.
    McLellan, Sandra L.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 77 (19) : 6972 - 6981
  • [28] Isolating the impact of septic systems on fecal pollution in streams of suburban watersheds in Georgia, United States
    Sowah, Robert A.
    Habteselassie, Mussie Y.
    Radcliffe, David E.
    Bauske, Ellen
    Risse, Mark
    WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 108 : 330 - 338
  • [29] Identifying Inorganic Turbidity in Water Samples as Potential Loss Factor During Nucleic Acid Extraction: Implications for Molecular Fecal Pollution Diagnostics and Source Tracking
    Linke, Rita B.
    Zeki, Sibel
    Mayer, Rene
    Keiblinger, Katharina
    Savio, Domenico
    Kirschner, Alexander K. T.
    Reischer, Georg H.
    Mach, Robert L.
    Sommer, Regina
    Farnleitner, Andreas H.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [30] Distributions of Fecal Indicators at Aquaculture Areas in a Bay of Republic of Korea
    Park, Sungjun
    Lee, Cheonghoon
    Jang, Sung Jae
    Cho, Kyuseon
    Kim, Jin Hwi
    Kim, Woon-Ki
    Kang, Joo-Hyon
    Park, Kwon-Sam
    Ko, Gwangpyo
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 34 (11) : 2223 - 2230