A Prospective, Ex Vivo Trial of Endobronchial Blockade Management Utilizing 3 Commonly Available Bronchial Blockers

被引:5
作者
Gilbert, Christopher R. [1 ]
Mallow, Christopher [2 ]
Wishire, Candice L. [1 ]
Chang, Shu-Ching [3 ]
Yarmus, Lonny B. [2 ]
Vallieres, Eric [1 ]
Haeck, Katherine [4 ]
Gorden, Jed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Canc Inst, Thorac Surg & Intervent Pulmonol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Intervent Pulmonol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Providence St Joseph Hlth, Med Data Res Ctr, Portland, OR USA
[4] Swedish Med Ctr, US Anesthesia Partners Washington, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
LUNG ISOLATION; MASSIVE HEMOPTYSIS; BRONCHOSCOPY; CUFF; SEPARATION; DIAGNOSIS; PRESSURE; CANCER; UPDATE; SALINE;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000004397
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Lung isolation with bronchial blockers is a well-described and accepted procedure, often described for use during the management of massive hemoptysis. Recommendations for balloon inflation are sparse, with some advocating for saline whereas other suggest air, including the manufacturers. We sought to evaluate the optimal method for balloon inflation in an ex vivo trial. METHODS: We performed a prospective trial utilizing 3 commercially available bronchial blockers commonly described for use in lung isolation and massive hemoptysis management. We utilized the Arndt Endobronchial Blocker (Cook Medical), the Cohen Tip Deflecting Endobronchial Blocker (Cook Medical), and the Fogarty Venous Thrombectomy Catheter (Edwards LifeSciences). Balloon size and deflation assessment were tested within 3 different scenarios comparing air versus saline. Welch t test was performed to compare means between groups, and a generalized estimating equation model was utilized to compare balloon diameter over time to account for correlation among repeated measures from the same balloon. RESULTS: All 3 endobronchial blocker systems were observed in triplicate. During free-standing balloon inflation, all 3 endobronchial systems displayed a greater degree of balloon deflation over time with air as opposed to saline (P < .001). Within a stent-based model, inflation with air of all 3 endobronchial systems, according to manufacturer recommendations, demonstrated significantly decreased time until fluid transgression occurred when compared to a saline model (P < .001). Within a stent-based model, inflation with air, according to clinical judgment, demonstrated significantly decreased time until fluid transgression in the Arndt (P = .016) and the Fogarty (P < .001) system, but not the Cohen (P = .173) system, when compared with saline. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of saline for balloon inflation during bronchial blockade allows for more consistent balloon inflation. The use of saline during balloon inflation appears to delay passive, spontaneous balloon deflation time when compared to air during a model of endobronchial blockade. The approach of saline inflation should be tested in humans to demonstrate the overall applicability and validity of the current findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1692 / 1698
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Applied longitudinal analysis
[2]  
CAHILL BC, 1994, CLIN CHEST MED, V15, P147
[3]  
Campos J H, 2001, Anesthesiol Clin North Am, V19, P455, DOI 10.1016/S0889-8537(05)70243-1
[4]   Lung isolation techniques for patients with difficult airway [J].
Campos, Javier H. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 23 (01) :12-17
[5]   An update on bronchial blockers during lung separation techniques in adults [J].
Campos, JH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05) :1266-1274
[6]   POINT: Should All Initial Episodes of Hemoptysis Be Evaluated by Bronchoscopy? Yes [J].
Cardenas-Garcia, Jose ;
Feller-Kopman, David .
CHEST, 2018, 153 (02) :302-305
[7]  
Carter R, 2011, ROUT INTROD APPL LIN, P3
[8]  
Cohen E, 2005, ANESTH ANALG, V101, P1877, DOI [10.1213/O1.ANE.0000184116.86888.D9, 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184116.86888.D9]
[9]   Intracuff Pressure and Tracheal Morbidity - Influence of Filling Cuff with Saline during Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia [J].
Combes, X ;
Schauvliege, F ;
Peyrouset, O ;
Motamed, C ;
Kirov, K ;
Dhonneur, G ;
Duvaldestin, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (05) :1120-1124
[10]  
Cook Medical, 2008, ARNDT END BLOCK SET, P3