Quantitative MRS: comparison of time domain and time domain frequency domain methods using a novel test procedure

被引:15
作者
Elster, C [1 ]
Link, A [1 ]
Schubert, F [1 ]
Seifert, F [1 ]
Walzel, M [1 ]
Rinneberg, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
MRS quantification; model fitting; overlapping background; time domain; frequency domain;
D O I
10.1016/S0730-725X(00)00140-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For quantitative analysis of in vivo MR spectra, a state-of-the-art time domain method was compared with a recently reported time domain frequency domain method which uses wavelets for background characterization. The comparison was made on the basis of results for simulated test problems that were constructed by combining measured and simulated MRS data at different signal-to-noise ratios in order to simultaneously reflect real world difficulties, in particular the overlapping background problem, and to allow for quantitative judgment of a method's accuracy. Incorporating prior knowledge was also considered. The results obtained give insight into the accuracy of the methods when applied to measured MRS data. Due to the improved background characterization, the time domain frequency domain method outperformed the time domain method in some of the test cases. Both methods were also applied to serial brain MR spectra of a healthy volunteer on 10 occasions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 606
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Absolute metabolite quantification by in vivo NMR spectroscopy:: V.: Multicentre quantitative data analysis trial on the overlapping background problem [J].
de Beer, R ;
Van den Boogaart, A ;
Cady, E ;
Graveron-Demilly, D ;
Knijn, A ;
Langenberger, KW ;
Lindon, JC ;
Ohlhoff, A ;
Serraî, H ;
Wylezinska-Arridge, M .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 16 (09) :1127-1137
[2]   IMPROVED QUANTIFICATION OF INVIVO H-1-NMR SPECTRA BY OPTIMIZATION OF SIGNAL ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING AND BY INCORPORATION OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE INTO THE SPECTRAL FITTING [J].
DEGRAAF, AA ;
BOVEE, WMMJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 15 (02) :305-319
[3]  
DEGRAFF RA, 1998, IN VIVO NMR SPECTROS
[4]   A mathematical assessment of the precision of parameters in measuring resonance spectra [J].
Golding, EM ;
Golding, RM .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1998, 135 (02) :380-405
[5]  
HATES MH, 1996, STAT DIGITAL SIGNAL
[6]   INVIVO NMR SPECTRAL PARAMETER-ESTIMATION - A COMPARISON BETWEEN TIME AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN METHODS [J].
JOLIOT, M ;
MAZOYER, BM ;
HUESMAN, RH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 18 (02) :358-370
[7]   FREQUENCY-SELECTIVE QUANTIFICATION IN THE TIME DOMAIN [J].
KNIJN, A ;
DEBEER, R ;
VANORMONDT, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1992, 97 (02) :444-450
[8]  
Misiti M., 1997, Wavelet Toolbox For Use With MATLAB, User's Guide, Version 1
[9]   SVD-BASED QUANTIFICATION OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SIGNALS [J].
PIJNAPPEL, WWF ;
VANDENBOOGAART, A ;
DEBEER, R ;
VANORMONDT, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1992, 97 (01) :122-134
[10]   ESTIMATION OF METABOLITE CONCENTRATIONS FROM LOCALIZED IN-VIVO PROTON NMR-SPECTRA [J].
PROVENCHER, SW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (06) :672-679