Reliability and Validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale in Elderly Individuals with Coronary Artery Disease

被引:7
作者
Pinho, Miriam Ximenes [1 ]
Custodio, Osvladir [1 ]
Makdisse, Marcia [1 ]
Carvalho, Antonio Carlos C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Depression; validity of test; coronary diseases; EDG-15; aged; CARDIAC MORTALITY; VALIDATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS; COMMUNITY; SYMPTOMS; VERSION; HEART; MOOD; RISK;
D O I
10.1590/S0066-782X2010005000032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The prevalence of depression in individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD) is high. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a broadly used tool to screen for depression in elderly individuals. In Brazil, the psychometric properties of the short version have not been adequately assessed. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the short version of the GDS in patients with CAD treated at a Cardiology Outpatient Clinic. Methods: The present is a cross-sectional study that assessed 209 elderly individuals (>= 65 years) with CAD using the GDS-15, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), the Brazilian OARS Multidimensional Function Assessment Questionnaire (BOMFAQ) and The Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX). The internal consistency of the GDS-15 was calculated through the KR-20. A factorial analysis of this scale was carried out. The CDS-15 scores were compared with the diagnoses of depression (DSM-IV) for the validity of criteria. At the analysis of concurrent validity the same scores were correlated with those of the CAMDEX, mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) and BOMFAQ depression scales. Results: Clinical depression was diagnosed in 35.71% of the sample assessed according to the DSM-IV. For the diagnosis of major depression or dystimia, the cutoff 5/6 presented moderate accuracy (AUROC = 0.84), sensitivity of 79.92% and specificity of 78.29%. The internal consistency was 0.80. At the factorial analysis, three obtained factors explained 52.72% of the total variance that was observed. The GDS-15 scores correlated with those of the CAMDEX depression scale. Conclusion: In general, the GDS-15 presented good reliability and validity (concurrent and of criterion). simple and fast, can be utilized in the screening for depression. (Arq Bras Cardiol 2010;94(5):535-544)
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 579
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Reliability of the Brazilian version of the geriatric depression scale (GDS) short form
    Almeida, OP
    Almeida, SA
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 1999, 57 (2B) : 421 - 426
  • [2] Almeida OP, 1999, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V14, P858, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199910)14:10<858::AID-GPS35>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-8
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, DSM 4
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, MICROFACT 2 0 MICROC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1978, Psychometric Theory
  • [7] [Anonymous], ARQ NEUROPSIQUIATR
  • [8] Development of the Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale and its short form among elderly psychiatric patients
    Bac, JN
    Cho, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (03) : 297 - 305
  • [9] Depression and long-term mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease
    Barefoot, JC
    Helms, MJ
    Mark, DB
    Blumenthal, JA
    Califf, RM
    Haney, TL
    OConnor, CM
    Siegler, IC
    Williams, RB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (06) : 613 - 617
  • [10] Model stability of the 15-item geriatric depression scale across cognitive impairment and severe depression
    Brown, Patrick J.
    Woods, Carol M.
    Storandt, Martha
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2007, 22 (02) : 372 - 379