Speaking of Risk: Matters of Context

被引:34
作者
Boholm, Asa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Sch Publ Adm, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Multidisciplinary Ctr Publ Sector Res, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE | 2009年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
Communication; Risk; Context; Environmental Planning; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; COMMUNICATION; TRUST; PERSPECTIVES; ENVIRONMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MEANINGS;
D O I
10.1080/17524030903230132
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The risk communication (RC) field is dominated by the practical and normative socio-technical aim of improving communication on risk (CR), especially from the viewpoint of regulatory agencies and government administrations. Despite some change of scope and orientation over the past 30 years, two theoretical ideas have persisted: the subjective-objective risk dichotomy and the transmission (also known as code) model of communication. This theoretical legacy makes context a blind spot in RC. The study of CR themes should consider (1) the socially constructed nature of risk and (2) communication as a situated social practice of information sharing. Results of a case study of public participation in a controversial railway tunnel project in the south of Sweden, offer lessons for future research pointing to crucial contextual dimensions of CR. It is argued that the variable ontology of risk, the constitutive nature of power relationships and the practical rationality of actors must be taken into account in research on the social CR.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 354
页数:20
相关论文
共 124 条
[21]   Future risk communication [J].
Bostrom, A .
FUTURES, 2003, 35 (06) :553-573
[22]   THE POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF DIFFERING CONCEPTS OF RISK [J].
BRADBURY, JA .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1989, 14 (04) :380-399
[23]  
Bratman Michael., 1987, Intention, Plans, and
[24]  
Bunge Mario., 1998, Social Science under Debate: A Philosophical Perspective
[25]  
Calman K.C., 1999, HLTH RISK SOC, V1, P107, DOI DOI 10.1080/13698579908407010
[26]  
Caplan P., 2000, RISK REVISITED
[27]   Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? [J].
Chess, C ;
Purcell, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (16) :2685-2692
[28]   Speaking like a state: Environmental justice and fish consumption advisories [J].
Chess, C ;
Burger, J ;
McDermott, MH .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2005, 18 (03) :267-278
[29]   RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RISK COMMUNICATION - NEXT STEPS FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES [J].
CHESS, C ;
SALOMONE, KL ;
HANCE, BJ ;
SAVILLE, A .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (02) :115-125
[30]   The risk/no-risk rhetoric of environmental impact assessments (EIA): the case of offshore wind farms in Sweden [J].
Corvellec, Herve ;
Boholm, Asa .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 13 (07) :627-640