Time-lapse gravity surveying as a monitoring tool for CO2 storage

被引:15
作者
Wilkinson, M. [1 ]
Mouli-Castillo, J. [1 ]
Morgan, P. [1 ]
Eid, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Grant Inst, Sch GeoSci, Kings Bldg,James Hutton Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Storage; Monitoring; Time-lapse; Gravity; CO2; leakage; SEA-FLOOR GRAVITY; TECHNOLOGIES; REMEDIATION; BOREHOLE; PROJECT; DENSITY; SURFACE; LEAKAGE; DESIGN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Time-lapse gravity surveys are a potential low cost method for detecting CO2 migration from a storage site, particularly where accumulation within an overlying aquifer is predicted. The modelled storage system consists of a storage reservoir (1000 m crestal depth) and an overlying aquifer at variable depths (50-750m crest), within a simple dome structure. In leakage scenarios, these are connected by a single vertical permeable pathway. CO2 leakage was simulated using the Permedia (R) CO2 simulator, and a gravity model calculated to compare a leakage and a non-leakage scenario. Time-lapse gravity surveys are likely to be able to detect CO2 leakage with CO2 accumulation within an aquifer to depths of at least 750 m, at least within an actively subsiding sedimentary basin where sandstones are expected to have high porosities at shallow burial depths. For a high relief structure in which the CO2 accumulates, the change in gravity cannot be used to detect the location of the leakage pathway as the measured gravity anomaly is centred on the geological structure. The first detection of leakage is possible after 11-15 years of leakage, though a maximum of only c. 1% of injected CO2 will have leaked at this time. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Results from Sleipner gravity monitoring: updated density and temperature distribution of the CO2 plume [J].
Alnes, Havard ;
Eiken, Ola ;
Nooner, Scott ;
Sasagawa, Glenn ;
Stenvold, Torkjell ;
Zumberge, Mark .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 :5504-5511
[2]  
Arts R., 2008, First break, V26, P65, DOI [DOI 10.3997/1365-2397.26.1115.27807, 10.3997/1365-2397.26.1115.27807]
[3]  
Bennion D.B., 2006, 102138 SOC PETR ENG
[4]   A risk-based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification of the Quest CCS Project, Alberta, Canada [J].
Bourne, Stephen ;
Crouch, Syrie ;
Smith, Mauri .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 26 :109-126
[5]   Electrical resistance tomographic monitoring of CO2 movement in deep geologic reservoirs [J].
Carrigan, Charles R. ;
Yang, Xianjin ;
LaBrecque, Douglas J. ;
Larsen, Dennis ;
Freeman, David ;
Ramirez, Abelardo L. ;
Daily, William ;
Aines, Roger ;
Newmark, Robin ;
Friedmann, Julio ;
Hovorka, Susan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 18 :401-408
[6]  
Chadwick RA, 2009, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V313, P257, DOI 10.1144/SP313.15
[7]   Evaluating time-lapse borehole gravity for CO2 plume detection at SECARB Cranfield [J].
Dodds, Kevin ;
Krahenbuhl, Richard ;
Reitz, Anya ;
Li, Yaoguo ;
Hovorka, Susan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 18 :421-429
[8]   An improved model calculating CO2 solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 bar [J].
Duan, ZH ;
Sun, R .
CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2003, 193 (3-4) :257-271
[9]   Evaluation and development of options for remediation of CO2 leakage into groundwater aquifers from geologic carbon storage [J].
Esposito, Ariel ;
Benson, Sally M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 7 :62-73
[10]   Geophysical methods for CO2 plume imaging: comparison of performances [J].
Fabriol, H. ;
Bitri, A. ;
Bourgeois, B. ;
Delatre, M. ;
Girard, J. F. ;
Pajot, G. ;
Rohmer, J. .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 :3604-3611