NON-ENHANCED PATTERN ON CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IN THE LOCAL EFFICACY ASSESSMENT OF IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION ABLATION OF PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Manxia [1 ]
Xie, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Xu, Ming [1 ]
Feng, Shiting [2 ]
Tian, Wenshuo [1 ]
Zhuang, Bowen [1 ]
Su, Liya [1 ]
Ye, Jieyi [1 ]
Lin, Jinhua [1 ]
Liang, Ping [3 ]
Yu, Jie [3 ]
Kuang, Ming [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Div Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, Affiliated Hosp 1,Inst Study Diagnost & Intervent, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Intervent Ultrasound, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Liver Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Irreversible electroporation ablation; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Imaging; Tumor response; PORCINE LIVER; US FINDINGS; TUMORS; CANCER; SAFETY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.018
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of the local efficacy after irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma 1 mo after ablation. Fifteen patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with IRE and then examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasound 1 mo after ablation. The contrast agent was SonoVue. Technical efficacy was assessed at 3 mo after IRE and classified as technical efficiency (TE) and technical inefficiency (TIE). Diagnostic performance was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Ten patients were considered as having TE, and five, TIE. Complete non-enhancement was observed in seven ablation zones (70.0%) in the TE group, and peripheral heterogeneous enhancement, in all five ablation zones (100.0%) in the TIE group. The non-enhancement pattern differed significantly between the TE and TIE groups (p = 0.026), with significant correlation with technical efficacy (p = 0.007). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (p = 0.008, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-1.05). A non-enhancement pattern using contrast-enhanced ultrasound was useful in the assessment of local efficacy after IRE ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. (E-mail: kuangm@mail.sysu.edu.cn) (C) 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1986 / 1995
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Radiomics Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Serous Cystadenoma
    Zhang, Yiqiong
    Yao, Jundong
    Liu, Fangyi
    Cheng, Zhigang
    Qi, Erpeng
    Han, Zhiyu
    Yu, Jie
    Dou, Jianping
    Liang, Ping
    Tan, Shuilian
    Dong, Xuejuan
    Li, Xin
    Sun, Ya
    Wang, Shuo
    Wang, Zhen
    Yu, Xiaoling
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 49 (12) : 2469 - 2475
  • [42] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the preoperative assessment of laryngeal carcinoma: a preliminary study
    Hu, Qiao
    Zhu, Shang Yong
    Liu, Ruo Chuan
    Zheng, Hong Yu
    Lun, Hai Mei
    Wei, Hai Ming
    Weng, Jing Jin
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (08) : 1016 - 1024
  • [43] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of focal pancreatic lesions in dogs
    Burti, Silvia
    Zotti, Alessandro
    Rubini, Giuseppe
    Orlandi, Riccardo
    Bargellini, Paolo
    Bonsembiante, Federico
    Contiero, Barbara
    Banzato, Tommaso
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2022, 191 (08) : no
  • [44] Enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Liu, Guang-Jian
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Lu, Ming-De
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Xu, Zuo-Feng
    Zheng, Yan-Ling
    Liang, Jin-Yu
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2006, 30 (05) : 315 - 321
  • [45] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Pattern of Splenic Metastases - a Retrospective Study in 32 Patients
    Neesse, A.
    Huth, J.
    Kunsch, S.
    Michl, P.
    Bert, T.
    Tebbe, J. J.
    Gress, T. M.
    Goerg, C.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2010, 31 (03): : 264 - 269
  • [46] The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vs. contrast-enhanced computed tomography in local staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a bi-national multicenter study
    Sbeit, Wisam
    Salman, Mahmoud
    Khalaileh, Abed
    Zoabi, Ahmad
    Bramnik, Zakhar
    Hovel, David
    Mahamid, Mahmud
    Israeli, Eran
    Katz, Lior
    Khoury, Reem
    Mubariki, Nama
    Lisotti, Andrea
    Awadie, Halim
    Khoury, Tawfik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 35 (09) : 974 - 979
  • [47] Vascular pattern and diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in spleen alterations
    Lerchbaumer, Markus Herbert
    Kleemann, Tobias
    Jung, Ernst-Michael
    Nagel, Sebastian
    Hamm, Bernd
    Fischer, Thomas
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2020, 75 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [48] The differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Yuan, Zhiqiang
    Li, Jiawu
    Yang, Lulu
    Shi, Yingyu
    Luo, Yan
    Li, J.
    Shi, Y.
    Yang, L.
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (07) : 4304 - 4318
  • [49] Bipolar radiofrequency ablation for liver tumors: comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with contrast-enhanced MRI/CT in the posttreatment imaging evaluation
    Bo, Xiao-Wan
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Sun, Li-Ping
    Zheng, Shu-Guang
    Guo, Le-Hang
    Lu, Feng
    Wu, Jian
    Xu, Xiao-Hong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (09): : 6108 - 6116
  • [50] Bayesian Quantification of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images With Adaptive Inclusion of an Irreversible Component
    Rizzo, Gaia
    Tonietto, Matteo
    Castellaro, Marco
    Raffeiner, Bernd
    Coran, Alessandro
    Fiocco, Ugo
    Stramare, Roberto
    Grisan, Enrico
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 36 (04) : 1027 - 1036