Budget Impact of Enzalutamide for Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

被引:18
作者
Bui, Cat N. [1 ]
O'Day, Ken [5 ]
Flanders, Scott [2 ]
Oestreicher, Nina [6 ]
Francis, Peter [7 ]
Posta, Linda [3 ]
Popelar, Breanna [5 ]
Tang, Hong [4 ]
Balk, Mark [8 ]
机构
[1] Astellas Pharma Global Dev, Global Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Oncol, Northbrook, IL USA
[2] Astellas Pharma Global Dev, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Oncol, Northbrook, IL USA
[3] Astellas Pharma Global Dev, Managed Markets & Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Northbrook, IL USA
[4] Astellas Pharma Global Dev, Oncol, Northbrook, IL USA
[5] Xcenda, Global Hlth Econ, Palm Harbor, FL USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] Medivation, Med Affairs, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Medivation, Med Affairs, Med Sci Liaisons, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
PLUS PREDNISONE; ECONOMIC BURDEN; CARE; PRINCIPLES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.2.163
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is expected to account for approximately one quarter of all new diagnoses of cancer in American men in 2015. The cost of prostate cancer care is expected to reach $15.1 billion by the year 2020, up from $11.9 billion in 2010. Given the high burden of prostate cancer, health care payers are interested in quantifying the potential budget impact of new therapies. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact of enzalutamide for the treatment of chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from a U.S. payer perspective. METHODS: A model was developed to assess the budget impact of enzalutamide for treatment of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients in a hypothetical 1-million-member U.S. health plan over a 1-year time horizon. Comparators included abiraterone acetate, sipuleucel-T, radium Ra 223 dichloride, and docetaxel. Epidemiologic data, including National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) incidence rates, were used to estimate the number of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients. Dosing, administration, duration of therapy, and adverse event rates were based on package inserts and pivotal studies. Drug costs were obtained from RED BOOK and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) average sales price pricing files, costs of administration and monitoring from the CMS physician fee schedule, and adverse events from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and published literature. Market shares were estimated for each comparator before and after adoption of enzalutamide. The incremental aggregate budget impact, per patient per year (PPPY), per patient per month (PPPM), and per member per month (PMPM), was calculated. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In a population of 115 chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients, adopting enzalutamide had an annual incremental budget impact of $510,641 ($4,426 PPPY, $369 PPPM, and $0.04 PMPM). Results were most sensitive to enzalutamide drug cost, size of the chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patient population, and enzalutamide adoption rate. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a modest 1-year budget impact of adopting enzalutamide for chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients, partly because of the cost offset of a moderate incidence of adverse events and lack of additional required monitoring. Copyright (C) 2016, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / U171
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Alemayehu B, 2010, J Med Econ, V13, P351, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2010.491435
  • [2] [Anonymous], AMCP FORM FORM SUBM
  • [3] Beer TM, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V371, P424, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1405095
  • [4] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2014, 2014 ASP DRUG PRIC F
  • [5] Listening to Provenge - What a Costly Cancer Treatment Says about Future Medicare Policy
    Chambers, James D.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (18) : 1687 - 1689
  • [6] Fuchs HE., 2021, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V71, P7, DOI [10.3322/caac.21654, DOI 10.3322/caac.20073, DOI 10.3322/CAAC.21332]
  • [7] Hansen RN, 2013, ISPOR 16 ANN EUR C N
  • [8] Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), 2015, WELC H CUPNET STAT H
  • [9] Hotte SJ, 2010, CURR ONCOL, V17, pS72
  • [10] Howden L.M., 2011, 2010 Census Briefs