Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children

被引:43
作者
Gordon, K. A.
Papsin, B. C.
Harrison, R. V.
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Cochlear Implant Lab, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Auditory Sci Lab, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON M5S1A1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
deafness; hearing loss; evoked potentials; apical; basal; cochlea; hearing aid; age at implant; residual hearing; electrically evoked auditory brainstern response (EABR); electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve (ECAP); neural response telemetry (NRT);
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.030
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The role of apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation on central auditory development was examined. We hypothesized that, in children with early onset deafness, auditory development evoked by basal electrode stimulation would differ from that evoked more apically. Methods: Responses of the auditory nerve and brainstem, evoked by an apical and a basal implant electrode, were measured over the first year of cochlear implant use in 50 children with early onset severe to profound deafness who used hearing aids prior to implantation. Results: Responses at initial stimulation were of larger amplitude and shorter latency when evoked by the apical electrode. No significant effects of residual hearing or age were found on initial response amplitudes or latencies. With implant use, responses evoked by both electrodes showed decreases in wave and interwave latencies reflecting decreased neural conduction time through the brainstem. Apical versus basal differences persisted with implant experience with one exception; eIII-eV interlatency differences decreased with implant use. Conclusions: Acute stimulation shows prolongation of basally versus apically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses in children with severe to profound deafness. Interwave latencies reflecting neural conduction along the caudal and rostral portions of the brainstem decreased over the first year of implant use. Differences in neural conduction times evoked by apical versus basal electrode stimulation persisted in the caudal but not rostral brainstem. Significance: Activity-dependent changes of the auditory brainstem occur in response to both apical and basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation. (c) 2007 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1684
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   ELECTRICALLY EVOKED BRAIN-STEM POTENTIALS IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS WITH MULTI-ELECTRODE STIMULATION [J].
ABBAS, PJ ;
BROWN, CJ .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (2-3) :153-162
[2]   Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential [J].
Abbas, PJ ;
Brown, CJ ;
Shallop, JK ;
Firszt, JB ;
Hughes, ML ;
Hong, SH ;
Staller, SJ .
EAR AND HEARING, 1999, 20 (01) :45-59
[3]   CHARACTERISTICS OF ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSES ELICITED WITH THE NUCLEUS 22-ELECTRODE INTRACOCHLEAR IMPLANT [J].
ALLUM, JHJ ;
SHALLOP, JK ;
HOTZ, M ;
PFALTZ, CR .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (04) :263-267
[4]  
Araki S, 1997, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V52, P39
[5]   Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: Channel interactions [J].
Bierer, JA ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 5 (01) :32-48
[6]   Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Dependence on electrode configuration [J].
Bierer, JA ;
Middlebrooks, JC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :478-492
[7]   Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking [J].
Cohen, LT ;
Richardson, LM ;
Saunders, E ;
Cowan, RSC .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 179 (1-2) :72-87
[8]  
Cowan RSC, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, pS125
[9]   Cochlear implants for children with significant residual hearing [J].
Dettman, S ;
D'Costa, WA ;
Dowell, RC ;
Winton, EJ ;
Hill, KL ;
Williams, SS .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2004, 130 (05) :612-618
[10]   Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing - Implications for selection criteria in children [J].
Dowell, RC ;
Hollow, R ;
Winton, E .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2004, 130 (05) :575-581