Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centred outcome) of the two-implant-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss

被引:29
作者
Vercruyssen, M. [1 ]
Quirynen, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Periodontol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
attachment loss; bone loss; implants; mandible; overdenture; peri-implantitis; pockets; susceptibility; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; 10-YEAR PROSPECTIVE COHORT; UNSPLINTED ORAL IMPLANTS; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES; 4 ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; DENTAL IMPLANTS; CHRONIC PERIODONTITIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective In part 2 of this long-term, retrospective study on the two-implant-supported overdenture in the mandible, the annual marginal bone loss was evaluated in detail and parameters, with a significant effect on the annual bone loss, were verified. Material and methods For all 495 patients with an overdenture in the mandible at least 5 years in function, data up to their last follow-up visit had been collected, including long-cone radiographs (taken at the abutment connection and after years 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 and 16 of loading) and probing data at their last evaluation. General information (medical history, implant data, report on surgery) was retrieved from the patient's file. Two hundred and forty-eight patients had been clinically examined recently. For the others, information on bone level and probing depths were retrieved from the patient's files, as all patients had been enrolled in our annual follow-up schedule. Results The mean annual bone loss on a site level (without considering the first year of bone remodelling) after 3 years of loading was 0.08 mm/year (SD=0.22, n=1105), after 5 years of loading 0.07 mm/year (SD=0.14, n=892), after 8 years of loading 0.06 mm/year (SD=0.12, n=598), after 12 years 0.04 mm/year (SD=0.07, n=370) and 0.05 mm/year (SD=0.05, n=154) after 16 years of loading. Ongoing bone loss was seen in a number of implants (n=26) with the annual bone loss exceeding 0.2 mm. Some factors clearly showed a significant impact on bone loss: smoking (>= 10 cigarettes/day), GBR, the presence of dehiscence and bone quantity(the latter only during the first year). The probing data showed a favourable condition, with < 1.2% of the approximal pockets being >= 6 mm, and 4.1%=5 mm. Conclusions The mean annual bone loss over the study period was < 0.1 mm/year after the first year of loading. However, a small number (2.5%) of the implants showed continuing bone loss. To cite this article:Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centred outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 2: marginal bone loss.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 466-472.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01902.x.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 472
页数:7
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW [J].
ADELL, R ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
ROCKLER, B ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06) :387-416
[2]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[3]  
ALBREKTSSON T, 1994, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON PERIODONTOLOGY, P365
[4]  
Astrand Per, 2004, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V6, P130, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00213.x
[5]  
Becker W, 1999, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V1, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00088.x
[6]   Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function [J].
Brägger, U ;
Aeschlimann, S ;
Bürgin, W ;
Hämmerle, CHF ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (01) :26-34
[7]  
BRANEMARK P I, 1969, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, V3, P81
[8]  
Buser D, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P405
[9]  
Carlsson GE, 2000, INT J PROSTHODONT, V13, P295
[10]   A CLASSIFICATION OF THE EDENTULOUS JAWS [J].
CAWOOD, JI ;
HOWELL, RA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1988, 17 (04) :232-236