Implementing flexible hybrid instruction in an electrical engineering course: The best of three worlds?

被引:17
作者
He, Wenliang [1 ]
Gajski, Daniel [2 ]
Farkas, George [1 ]
Warschauer, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Educ, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Henry Samueli Sch Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Hybrid instruction; Class attendance; Study effort; Motivation Electrical engineering; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; CLASS ATTENDANCE; CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION; DISTANCE EDUCATION; PANEL-DATA; PRINCIPLES; MOTIVATION; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study explored a modified version of hybrid instruction, referred to as the flexible hybrid format, in a lower division electrical engineering course offered at a large public university. The objective of the study is to use longitudinal data to investigate the impact of class attendance, out-of-class study time, and motivation on student exam performance. Generalized least squares and fixed effects models were used in the analyses. It was found that class attendance was indispensable; it was associated with exam performance even when all essential course material was made available online and students generally rated the online instruction component to be of higher quality. The benefit of class attendance was then explained by the ICAP hypothesis and spaced learning practice and it was suggested that online education might be more effective in teaching relatively simpler contents. Out-of-class effort significantly predicated performance in previous weeks, but not in the final period. The harmful effect of cramming was cited to explain this phenomenon. Hence, by implication, time management might be an issue in a flexible hybrid environment. Finally, motivation was found to be a robust predicator of performance and its effect was the strongest when the course was at its most challenging stage. Besides, the relationship between motivation and exam performance was likely to be bidirectional, as higher motivation resulted in better performance, which in turn further boosted motivation. Based on current findings, directions for future research were also suggested to verify our claims and improve our implementation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Allen I.E., 2010, Class Differences Online Education in the United States, 2010
[2]   Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness [J].
Allen, Jeff ;
Robbins, Steven B. ;
Casillas, Alex ;
Oh, In-Sue .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 49 (07) :647-664
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century
[4]  
Aslanian C., 2001, COMMUNITY COLL J, V71, P56
[5]  
Baillie C., 2010, European Journal of Engineering Education, V25, P145
[6]   How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature [J].
Bernard, RM ;
Abrami, PC ;
Lou, YP ;
Borokhovski, E ;
Wade, A ;
Wozney, L ;
Wallet, PA ;
Fiset, M ;
Huang, BR .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (03) :379-439
[7]   Personality type and student performance in principles of economics [J].
Borg, MO ;
Shapiro, SL .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1996, 27 (01) :3-&
[8]  
Bowen W.G., 2013, Education Next, V13
[9]   LINKING TEACHER AND STUDENT LEARNING STYLES WITH STUDENT-ACHIEVEMENT AND ATTITUDES [J].
CHARKINS, RJ ;
OTOOLE, DM ;
WETZEL, JN .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 1985, 16 (02) :111-120
[10]   Class attendance and exam performance: A randomized experiment [J].
Chen, Jennjou ;
Lin, Tsui-Fang .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2008, 39 (03) :213-227