Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries

被引:79
作者
Torring, M. L. [1 ]
Murchie, P. [2 ]
Hamilton, W. [3 ]
Vedsted, P. [4 ]
Esteva, M. [5 ]
Lautrup, M. [6 ]
Winget, M. [7 ]
Rubin, G. [8 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Sch Culture & Soc, Dept Anthropol, Moesgaard Alle 20, DK-8270 Hojbjerg, Denmark
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Div Appl Hlth Sci, Ctr Acad Primary Care, Polwarth Bldg,Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[3] Univ Exeter, Coll House,St Lukes Campus,Magdalen Rd, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[4] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, Res Ctr Canc Diag Primary Care, Bartholins Alle 20, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Balearic Islands Hlth Res Inst IdISBa, Primary Care Majorca Dept, Primary Care Res Unit, Reina Esclaramunda 9, Palma De Mallorca 07003, Spain
[6] Vejle Hosp, Dept Organ & Plast Surg, Breast Ctr, Kabbeltoft 25, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
[7] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Primary Care & Populat Hlth, 1265 Welch Rd,MSOB X214, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Univ Durham, Wolfson Res Inst, Sch Med Pharm & Hlth, Queens Campus,Univ Blvd, Stockton On Tees TS17 6BH, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
delayed diagnosis; waiting lists; tumour staging; colorectal cancer; primary health-care; bias; THERAPEUTIC DELAY; BREAST-CANCER; RECTAL-CANCER; TIME; SURVIVAL; MORTALITY; SYMPTOMS; DURATION; ASSOCIATION; PARADOX;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2017.236
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval. Methods: We identified seven independent data sets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11 720 newly diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Data sets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual data sets and, using the same method, analysed a pooled individual patient data set. Results: The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined data set. There was a statistically significant convex (boolean AND-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e., distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P = 0.004), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care, we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (boolean OR-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific 'safe' waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 897
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A self administered reliable questionnaire to assess lower bowel symptoms [J].
Adelstein, Barbara-Ann ;
Irwig, Les ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Katelaris, Peter H. ;
Jones, David B. ;
Bokey, Les .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[2]   PATIENTS AND DOCTORS DELAY IN PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER - PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
AFZELIUS, P ;
ZEDELER, K ;
SOMMER, H ;
MOURIDSEN, HT ;
BLICHERTTOFT, M .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1994, 33 (04) :345-351
[3]   Decision making and referral from primary care for possible lung and colorectal cancer: a qualitative study of patients' experiences [J].
Banks, Jon ;
Walter, Fiona M. ;
Hall, Nicola ;
Mills, Katie ;
Hamilton, William ;
Turner, Katrina M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (629) :E775-E782
[4]   Deriving stage at diagnosis from multiple population-based sources: colorectal and lung cancer in England [J].
Benitez-Majano, S. ;
Fowler, H. ;
Maringe, C. ;
Di Girolamo, C. ;
Rachet, B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (03) :391-400
[5]   The waiting time paradox: population based retrospective study of treatment delay and survival of women with endometrial cancer in Scotland [J].
Crawford, SC ;
Davis, JA ;
Siddiqui, NA ;
de Caestecker, L ;
Gillis, CR ;
Hole, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7357) :196-196
[6]   FLEXIBLE REGRESSION-MODELS WITH CUBIC-SPLINES [J].
DURRLEMAN, S ;
SIMON, R .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1989, 8 (05) :551-561
[7]   Factors related with symptom duration until diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer [J].
Esteva, Magdalena ;
Leiva, Alfonso ;
Ramos, Maria ;
Pita-Fernandez, Salvador ;
Gonzalez-Lujan, Luis ;
Casamitjana, Montse ;
Sanchez, Maria A. ;
Pertega-Diaz, Sonia ;
Ruiz, Amador ;
Gonzalez-Santamaria, Paloma ;
Martin-Rabadan, Maria ;
Costa-Alcaraz, Ana M. ;
Espi, Alejandro ;
Macia, Francesc ;
Segura, Josep M. ;
Lafita, Sergio ;
Arnal-Monreal, Francisco ;
Amengual, Isabel ;
Bosca-Watts, Marta M. ;
Hospital, Angels ;
Manzano, Hermini ;
Magallon, Rosa .
BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
[8]   Factors influencing delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer:: a study protocol [J].
Esteva, Magdalena ;
Ramos, Maria ;
Cabeza, Elena ;
Llobera, Joan ;
Ruiz, Amador ;
Pita, Salvador ;
Segura, Josep M. ;
Cortes, Jose M. ;
Gonzalez-Lujan, Luis .
BMC CANCER, 2007, 7 (1)
[9]   Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study [J].
Hamilton, W ;
Round, A ;
Sharp, D ;
Peters, TJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (04) :399-405
[10]   Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines [J].
Hamilton, W ;
Sharp, D .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 21 (01) :99-106