The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: An Interview Study with Professionals

被引:12
作者
Geerts, Paulus A. F. [1 ,2 ]
van der Weijden, Trudy [3 ]
Savelberg, Wilma [4 ]
Altan, Melis [5 ]
Chisari, Giorgio [5 ]
Launert, Diana Ricarda [5 ]
Mesters, Hannah [5 ]
Pisters, Ylva [5 ]
van Heumen, Mike [5 ]
Hermanns, Raoul [5 ]
Bos, Gerard M. J. [1 ,2 ]
Moser, Albine [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Div Hematol, Dept Internal Med, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch GROW, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Sch CAPHRI, Dept Family Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Oncol Ctr, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci FHML, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Zuyd Univ Appl Sci, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
patient-centered care; decision-making; patient care team; cancer; patient care; multidisciplinary team; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; BREAST-CANCER; CARE; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2147/JMDH.S286044
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient-centeredness is essential in complex oncological multidisciplinary team decision-making. Improvement seems to be needed, while there is a lack of knowledge about health care providers' needs for improvement. Objective: To explore multidisciplinary team members' perspectives on the need to improve patient-centeredness in complex decision-making, and subsequently the strategies to enhance it. Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive interview study. The participants were twenty-four professionals who attended multidisciplinary cancer team meetings weekly. The setting was five multidisciplinary teams (gastrointestinal, gynecological, urological, head and neck, and hematological cancer) in a Dutch academic hospital. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and were analyzed with a combination of inductive and deductive content analysis. Results: The participants voiced the need for additional information (patient-centered information, patients's needs and preferences, individualized medical information) during the multidisciplinary team meeting, to be more patient-centered in the decision-making conversation with the patient following the meeting, and for more information following the meeting to support patient-centeredness. The strategies, which mostly originated from the needs, were categorized as organization, decision-making, and communication. The most prominent strategies were those aimed at collecting and using patient-centered information, and to facilitate the decision-making conversation with the patient following the multi-disciplinary team meeting. Conclusion: Our findings highlighted the need to improve patient-centeredness in oncological multidisciplinary teams and provided a comprehensive overview of strategies for improvement, supported by multidisciplinary team members. These strategies emphasize involvement of patients throughout the continuous process of decision-making for patients with cancer. These strategies may be implemented in other oncological multidisciplinary teams, taking in mind the local needs. Future research may help to prioritize the strategies and to determine and evaluate the effect on endpoints, like patient or professional satisfaction, shared decision-making, and on the decision that was made.
引用
收藏
页码:1311 / 1324
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW, DOI DOI 10.17226/10027
[3]   Physicians' attitudes and perspectives regarding the uptake of psychosocial aspects and/or patient preferences during multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology [J].
Baes, S. ;
Horlait, M. ;
Dhaene, S. ;
Leys, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION, 2020, 23 (2-3) :107-114
[4]   The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review [J].
Basta, Yara L. ;
Bolle, Sifra ;
Fockens, Paul ;
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (09) :2669-2678
[5]   Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams [J].
Blazeby, JM ;
Wilson, L ;
Metcalfe, C ;
Nicklin, J ;
English, R ;
Donovan, JL .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) :457-460
[6]   Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care [J].
Borras, Josep M ;
Albreht, Tit ;
Audisio, Riccardo ;
Briers, Erik ;
Casali, Paolo ;
Esperou, Helene ;
Grube, Birgitte ;
Hamoir, Marc ;
Henning, Geoffrey ;
Kelly, Joan ;
Knox, Susan ;
Nabal, Maria ;
Pierotti, Marco ;
Lombardo, Claudio ;
van Harten, Wim ;
Poston, Graeme ;
Prades, Joan ;
Sant, Milena ;
Travado, Luzia ;
Valentini, Vincenzo ;
van de Velde, Cornelis ;
van den Bogaert, Saskia ;
van den Bulcke, Marc ;
van Hoof, Elke ;
van den Neucker, Ingrid ;
Wilson, Robin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (03) :475-480
[7]   Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review [J].
Castro, Eva Marie ;
Van Regenmortel, Tine ;
Vanhaecht, Kris ;
Sermeus, Walter ;
Van Hecke, Ann .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (12) :1923-1939
[8]   Team Dynamics, Decision Making, and Attitudes Toward Multidisciplinary Cancer Meetings: Health Professionals' Perspectives [J].
Devitt, Bianca ;
Philip, Jennifer ;
McLachlan, Sue-Anne .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2010, 6 (06) :E17-E20
[9]   The qualitative content analysis process [J].
Elo, Satu ;
Kyngaes, Helvi .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) :107-115
[10]   A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Durand, Marie Anne ;
Song, Julia ;
Aarts, Johanna ;
Barr, Paul J. ;
Berger, Zackary ;
Cochran, Nan ;
Frosch, Dominick ;
Galasinski, Dariusz ;
Gulbrandsen, Pal ;
Han, Paul K. J. ;
Haerter, Martin ;
Kinnersley, Paul ;
Lloyd, Amy ;
Mishra, Manish ;
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth ;
Scholl, Isabelle ;
Tomori, Kounosuke ;
Trevena, Lyndal ;
Witteman, Holly O. ;
Van der Weijden, Trudy .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 359