Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study

被引:1
作者
Kim, Min-Joong [1 ]
Kim, Il-Hyung [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Na-Hee [3 ]
Kim, Young-Kyun [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Sect Dent, Bundang Hosp, 82 Gumi Ro 173beon Gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
[2] Armed Forces Med Command, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Armed Forces Capital Dent Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Biomed Res Inst, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Dental implants; Dental implantation; Endosseous; Dental materials; Osseointegration; NONSURGICAL TREATMENT; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; PLACEMENT; FAILURES;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the CA implants (Osstem Implant, Busan, Korea), calcium-modified surfaced treated implants on acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina. Methods From January 2013 to December 2015, 258 implants of 120 patients placed between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Using medical records and periapical radiographs, sex, age, location, fixture width and length of placed implants, presence or absence of bone graft, types of bone substitutes and membrane used for bone grafting, primary and secondary stability, initial and delayed complications, and marginal bone loss were investigated. The success rate and survival rate of the implants in each group were analyzed retrospectively based on the criteria suggested by Albrektsson et al. Results Between 2013 and 2015, with a follow-up longer than 5 years, 258 implants with an average diameter of 4.63 mm (3.5-5.5 mm) and an average length of 9.94 mm (7.0-13.0 mm) were placed in a total of 120 patients (61 males and 59 females) with a mean age of 63.7 years for an average of 62 months of observation period. The survival rate was 97.3%, the success rate was 94.2%, and the average final marginal bone loss was 0.074 mm. Conclusion The CA implants manufactured with the improved surface treatment method exhibited a survival rate of 97.3% and a success rate of 94.2% over an average observation period of 62 months. The implants were not affected by most factors and had very high survival and success rates over a long period of observation. In particular, the stability of the implant was excellent, with no cases of failed implants in delayed placement after bone grafting and a healing period.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ahmed ELD., 2014, J Oral Biol, V1, P8
[2]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[3]   Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A 17-Year Follow-Up Clinical Case Report [J].
Bassi, Fabrizio ;
Poli, Pier Paolo ;
Rancitelli, Davide ;
Signorino, Fabrizio ;
Maiorana, Carlo .
CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2015, 2015
[4]   10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients [J].
Buser, Daniel ;
Janner, Simone F. M. ;
Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela ;
Braegger, Urs ;
Ramseier, Christoph A. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06) :839-851
[5]  
Choi HY., 2014, IMPLANTOL, V18, P102
[6]  
Choi KK., 2016, J DENT IMPLANT RES, V35, P9
[7]   Immunohistochemistry of soft tissues surrounding late failures of Branemark implants [J].
Esposito, M ;
Thomsen, P ;
Molne, J ;
Gretzer, C ;
Ericson, LE ;
Lekholm, U .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (05) :352-366
[8]   Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (I). Success criteria and epidemiology [J].
Esposito, M ;
Hirsch, JM ;
Lekholm, U ;
Thomsen, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1998, 106 (01) :527-551
[9]  
Esposito M, 2000, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V2, P18, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00103.x
[10]  
Esposito M, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P798