Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma - a Role in Patients with Para-aortic Lymph Node Involvement? A 10-year Institutional Experience

被引:4
作者
Green, H. M. [1 ]
Counsell, N. [2 ,3 ]
Ward, A. [1 ]
McCormack, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] UCL, Canc Res UK, London, England
[3] UCL, Univ Coll London Canc Trials Ctr, London, England
关键词
Extended-field radiotherapy; locally advanced cervical cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; para-aortic lymph node; EXTENDED-FIELD IRRADIATION; BULKY STAGE-IB; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; CANCER; BRACHYTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; TRIAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: Overall survival and progression-free survival with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma have been described as 66% and 58%, respectively, at 5 years. Para-aortic lymph node involvement significantly increases the risk of relapse and death. The role of additional chemotherapy in these patients is as yet undefined. This aim of the present study was to determine the outcome of a cohort of para-aortic lymph node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by extended-field chemoradiation compared with patients treated with extended-field chemoradiation without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and methods: We reviewed patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2014 stage IB1-IVA cervical carcinoma who received extended-field radiotherapy in addition to standard pelvic chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, at University College London Hospital (January 2007 to January 2018). Patients in open clinical trials were excluded. Results: Overall, 47 patients (15.8% of 298 eligible patients) with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node-positive cervical carcinoma received extended-field radiotherapy. Nineteen patients (40.4%) had both neoadjuvant chemotherapy (all received six cycles) and extended-field radiotherapy (median 44 days); 28 (59.6%) patients received extended-field radiotherapy alone (median 43 days). All patients completed radical radiotherapy within 49 days. We observed evidence that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended-field radiotherapy had a lower risk of death (median follow-up 4.8 years, three deaths) compared with extended-field radiotherapy alone (median follow-up 3.0 years, 11 deaths; hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.08-1.00; P = 0.05). Three-year overall survival rates were 83.3% (95% confidence interval 66.1-100) and 64.6% (95% confidence interval 44.6-84.6), respectively. A PFS benefit was seen (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.77; P = 0.02), with 3-year PFS rates of 77.8% (95% confidence interval 58.6-97.0) and 35.0% (95% confidence interval 14.0-56.0), respectively. Conclusions: Our institutional experience suggests that the use of additional systemic therapy before chemoradiotherapy benefits patients with locoregionally advanced (FIGO 2018 IIIC2) cervical cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with longer overall survival and PFS, without compromising definitive extended-field chemoradiation. (C) 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E281 / E290
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Is extended-field concurrent chemoradiation an option for radiologic negative paraaortic lymph node, locally advanced cervical cancer?
    Al Asiri, Mushabbab
    Tunio, Mutahir A.
    Mohamed, Reham
    Bayoumi, Yasser
    Alhadab, Abdulrehman
    Saleh, Rasha M.
    AlArifi, Muhannad Saud
    Alobaid, Abdelaziz
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2014, 6 : 339 - 348
  • [2] Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis
    Alberts, David S.
    Brady, Mark
    Cikaric, Slobodan
    Chen, Hongwei
    Dinshaw, Ketayun
    Eifel, Patricia J.
    Garipagaoglu, Melahat
    Jakobsen, Anders
    Kantardzic, Nermina
    Keys, Henry
    Lal, Punita
    Lanciano, Rachelle
    Leborgne, Felix
    Lorvidhaya, Vicharn
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    Parmar, Mahesh K. B.
    Pearcey, Robert G.
    Pras, Elizabeth
    Roberts, Kenneth
    Rose, Peter G.
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Tierney, Jayne F.
    Thomas, Gillian
    Trimble, Ted
    Vale, Claire
    Whitney, Charles W.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01):
  • [3] FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri
    Belhadj, H.
    Berek, J.
    Bermudez, A.
    Bhatla, N.
    Cain, J.
    Denny, L.
    Fujiwara, K.
    Hacker, N.
    Avall-Lundqvist, E.
    Mutch, D.
    Odicino, F.
    Pecorelli, S.
    Prat, J.
    Quinn, M.
    Seoud, M. A-F.
    Shrivastava, S. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 125 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [4] Cancer of the cervix uteri
    Bhatla, Neerja
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 : 22 - 36
  • [5] Chatani M., 1995, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, V171, P655
  • [6] The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cervical Cancer
    Cibula, David
    Poetter, Richard
    Planchamp, Francois
    Avall-Lundqvist, Elisabeth
    Fischerova, Daniela
    Haie-Meder, Christine
    Koehler, Christhardt
    Landoni, Fabio
    Lax, Sigurd
    Lindegaard, Jacob Christian
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Mathevet, Patrice
    McCluggage, W. Glenn
    McCormack, Mary
    Naik, Raj
    Nout, Remi
    Pignata, Sandro
    Ponce, Jordi
    Querleu, Denis
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Tamussino, Karl
    Wimberger, Pauline
    Raspollini, Maria Rosaria
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 472 (06) : 919 - 936
  • [7] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Followed by Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial
    da Costa, Samantha Cabral S.
    Bonadio, Renata Colombo
    Gabrielli, Flavia Carolina G.
    Aranha, Andrea S.
    Dias Genta, Maria Luiza N.
    Miranda, Vanessa C.
    de Freitas, Daniela
    Abdo Filho, Elias
    Ferreira, Patricia A. O.
    Machado, Karime K.
    Scaranti, Mariana
    Carvalho, Heloisa de A.
    Estevez-Diz, Maria Del Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (33) : 3124 - +
  • [8] Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01
    Eifel, PJ
    Winter, K
    Morris, M
    Levenback, C
    Grigsby, PW
    Cooper, J
    Rotman, M
    Gershenson, D
    Mutch, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) : 872 - 880
  • [9] Long-term follow-up of RTOG 92-10: Cervical cancer with positive para-aortic lymph nodes
    Grigsby, PW
    Heydon, K
    Mutch, DG
    Kim, RY
    Eifel, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04): : 982 - 987
  • [10] IS PROPHYLACTIC PARA-AORTIC IRRADIATION WORTHWHILE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED CERVICAL-CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE EORTC RADIOTHERAPY GROUP
    HAIE, C
    PEJOVIC, MH
    GERBAULET, A
    HORIOT, JC
    POURQUIER, H
    DELOUCHE, J
    HEINZ, JF
    BRUNE, D
    FENTON, J
    PIZZI, G
    BEY, P
    BROSSEL, R
    PILLEMENT, P
    VOLTERRANI, F
    CHASSAGNE, D
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (02) : 101 - 112