How peer proximity moderates indirect media influence on adolescent smoking

被引:60
作者
Paek, Hye-Jin [1 ]
Gunther, Albert C.
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
influence of presumed influence; antismoking media campaigns; peer proximity; peer perception;
D O I
10.1177/0093650207302785
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examines direct and indirect impacts of antismoking media messages on adolescents' smoking attitudes and intentions to smoke. Elaborating on the influence of presumed influence model, this study incorporates the moderating role of peer proximity (i.e., proximal versus distal peers). Analyzing direct effects in a survey of 1,687 middle school students, we find that antismoking media messages have unexpected effects among both ever-smokers (experimenters and established smokers) and never-smokers. But analysis of indirect paths reveal significant effects in the intended direction. In addition, these effects are moderated by peer proximity. Respondents' perception that proximal peers, but not distal peers, are more influenced by such messages lead to a significant decrease in their favorable thoughts toward smoking and intention to smoke. The data suggest that antismoking messages may only achieve their desired effect via the indirect influence path.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 432
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[61]  
Ross Mike, 1985, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V2, P73
[62]  
Sherif M., 1964, Reference groups
[63]  
exploration into conformity and deviation of adolescents
[64]   Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: The foundation of media effects research [J].
Slater, MD .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2004, 81 (01) :168-183
[65]   Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti-marijuana PSAs [J].
Stephenson, MT ;
Palmgreen, P .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2001, 68 (01) :49-71
[66]   ADOLESCENT NONSMOKERS, TRIERS, AND REGULAR SMOKERS ESTIMATES OF CIGARETTE-SMOKING PREVALENCE - WHEN DO OVERESTIMATIONS OCCUR AND BY WHOM [J].
SUSSMAN, S ;
DENT, CW ;
MESTELRAUCH, J ;
JOHNSON, CA ;
HANSEN, WB ;
FLAY, BR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 18 (07) :537-551
[67]  
Turner JC, 1991, SOC INFLUENCE
[68]  
TVERSKY A, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P105, DOI 10.1037/h0031322
[69]   LOCUS OF PEER INFLUENCE - SOCIAL CROWD AND BEST FRIEND [J].
URBERG, KA .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 1992, 21 (04) :439-450
[70]   Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: A review [J].
Wakefield, M ;
Flay, B ;
Nichter, M ;
Giovino, G .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2003, 8 (03) :229-247