How peer proximity moderates indirect media influence on adolescent smoking

被引:60
作者
Paek, Hye-Jin [1 ]
Gunther, Albert C.
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
influence of presumed influence; antismoking media campaigns; peer proximity; peer perception;
D O I
10.1177/0093650207302785
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examines direct and indirect impacts of antismoking media messages on adolescents' smoking attitudes and intentions to smoke. Elaborating on the influence of presumed influence model, this study incorporates the moderating role of peer proximity (i.e., proximal versus distal peers). Analyzing direct effects in a survey of 1,687 middle school students, we find that antismoking media messages have unexpected effects among both ever-smokers (experimenters and established smokers) and never-smokers. But analysis of indirect paths reveal significant effects in the intended direction. In addition, these effects are moderated by peer proximity. Respondents' perception that proximal peers, but not distal peers, are more influenced by such messages lead to a significant decrease in their favorable thoughts toward smoking and intention to smoke. The data suggest that antismoking messages may only achieve their desired effect via the indirect influence path.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 432
页数:26
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]  
Brown BB., 1990, THRESHOLD DEV ADOLES, P171
[12]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPANIONSHIP AND INTIMACY [J].
BUHRMESTER, D ;
FURMAN, W .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1987, 58 (04) :1101-1113
[13]  
BUSH PJ, 1985, ETIOLOGY DRUG ABUSE
[14]   How peers mediate media influence on adolescents' sexual attitudes and sexual behavior [J].
Chia, Stella C. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2006, 56 (03) :585-606
[15]  
Cialdini R., 2007, INFLUENCE PSYCHOL PE
[16]   THE MULTIDIMENSIONALITY OF PEER PRESSURE IN ADOLESCENCE [J].
CLASEN, DR ;
BROWN, BB .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 1985, 14 (06) :451-468
[17]   PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION - AN EXPERIMENT ON 3RD-PERSON EFFECTS [J].
COHEN, J ;
MUTZ, D ;
PRICE, V ;
GUNTHER, A .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1988, 52 (02) :161-173
[18]   Methodological artifact or persistent bias? - Testing the robustness of the third-person and reverse third-person effects for alcohol messages [J].
David, P ;
Liu, K ;
Myser, M .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (02) :206-233
[19]   THE PERCEIVED INFLUENCE OF AIDS ADVERTISING - 3RD-PERSON EFFECTS IN THE CONTEXT OF POSITIVE MEDIA CONTENT [J].
DUCK, JM ;
TERRY, DJ ;
HOGG, MG .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 17 (03) :305-325
[20]   High-risk behaviors associated with early smoking: Results from a 5-year follow-up [J].
Ellickson, PL ;
Tucker, JS ;
Klein, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2001, 28 (06) :465-473