Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy

被引:30
作者
Acar-Burkay, Sinem [1 ]
Cristian, Daniela-Carmen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway
[2] City Univ London, Bayes Business Sch, London, England
关键词
Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccination intentions; Vaccine acceptance; COVID-19; Cognition; Executive function; Stroop task; Stress; Trust; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MECHANICAL TURK; STRESS; PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDES; NUMERACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Rationale: Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitancy is associated with executive function-a group of high-level cognitive skills including attentional control, working memory, inhibition, self regulation, cognitive flexibility, and strategic planning.Objective: We set out to test (i) whether vaccine hesitancy is driven by individual differences in executive function beyond established socio-demographic factors (e.g., education, political orientation, gender, ethnicity, age, religiosity) and depressed mood, and (ii) whether this relationship is exacerbated by situational stress. Methods: Two studies were conducted with U.S. residents. Using a cross-sectional design, Study 1 examined the associations between executive function, socio-demographic factors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using an experimental design, Study 2 focused solely on unvaccinated individuals and tested the interactive effect of executive function and stress on willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the data. Results: Individual differences in executive function predicted participants' COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Importantly, the unique contribution of executive function to vaccine hesitancy could not be explained by socio-demographic factors or depressed mood. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that weaker executive function had detrimental effects on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and trust in health authorities mainly under heightened stress.Conclusions: Individual differences in executive function and situational stress jointly impact COVID-19 vaccination decisions and need to be considered together when designing health communications aimed at reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Interventions that lower stress and promote trust have the potential to increase vaccine acceptance, especially for individuals with weaker executive function.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study
    Batty, G. David
    Deary, Ian J.
    Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
    Gale, Catharine R.
    Altschul, Drew
    [J]. BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2021, 96 : 100 - 105
  • [2] Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester, Michael
    Kwang, Tracy
    Gosling, Samuel D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [3] Black-white disparities in 2009 H1N1 vaccination among adults in the United States: A cautionary tale for the COVID-19 pandemic
    Burger, Andrew E.
    Reither, Eric N.
    Mamelund, Svenn-Erik
    Lim, Sojung
    [J]. VACCINE, 2021, 39 (06) : 943 - 951
  • [4] Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19
    Callaghan, Timothy
    Moghtaderi, Ali
    Lueck, Jennifer A.
    Hotez, Peter
    Strych, Ulrich
    Dor, Avi
    Fowler, Erika Franklin
    Motta, Matthew
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 272
  • [5] Executive function and probabilities of engaging in long-term sedentary and high calorie/low nutrition eating behaviors in early adolescence
    Cappelli, Christopher
    Pike, James Russell
    Riggs, Nathaniel R.
    Warren, Christopher M.
    Pentz, Mary Ann
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 237
  • [6] Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies
    Carpiano, Richard M.
    Fitz, Nicholas S.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 185 : 127 - 136
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, CDC IS MAK COVID 19
  • [8] The politics of COVID-19 vaccination in middle-income countries: Lessons from Brazil
    da Fonseca, Elize Massard
    Shadlen, Kenneth C.
    Bastos, Francisco I.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 281
  • [9] Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations
    Dai, Hengchen
    Saccardo, Silvia
    Han, Maria A.
    Roh, Lily
    Raja, Naveen
    Vangala, Sitaram
    Modi, Hardikkumar
    Pandya, Shital
    Sloyan, Michael
    Croymans, Daniel M.
    [J]. NATURE, 2021, 597 (7876) : 404 - +
  • [10] A bidirectional relationship between physical activity and executive function in older adults
    Daly, Michael
    McMinn, David
    Allan, Julia L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 8