On regional integration, fiscal income, and GDP per capita

被引:1
作者
Han, Yutao [1 ]
Song, Zhen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Dept Econ, 10 Huixindongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, CEMA, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
differential game; fiscal revenue; policy flexibility; regional integration; TAX COMPETITION; ECONOMIC-INTEGRATION; GROWTH; STATES; POOR; RICH; INVESTMENT; DEFAULT; TRADE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/sjpe.12281
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the economic impacts of regional integration on a small, less developed jurisdiction in a dynamic fiscal competition environment. The trade-offs between the economic benefits and the loss of policy flexibility resulting from integration are analyzed from the perspectives of fiscal revenue and GDP per capita. Our results show that the small jurisdiction's loss of flexibility in policymaking can dominate the other effects of integration. Specifically, if the small jurisdiction's efficiency in providing public inputs is originally sufficiently high (low), regional integration always reduces (improves) its net revenue, independently of the extent of efficiency improvement due to integration. However, when the small jurisdiction's efficiency is originally intermediate, the impact on net revenue crucially depends on the magnitude of the efficiency effect. Our analysis also characterizes the trade-offs resulting from integration between policy flexibility on the one hand and capital mobility and fiscal equalization on the other.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 532
页数:27
相关论文
共 63 条
[31]   Asymmetric competition among nation states: A differential game approach [J].
Han, Yutao ;
Pieretti, Patrice ;
Zanaj, Skerdilajda ;
Zou, Benteng .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2014, 119 :71-79
[32]   Growth effects of European integration [J].
Henrekson, M ;
Torstensson, J ;
Torstensson, R .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 41 (08) :1537-1557
[33]   Competing in taxes and investment under fiscal equalization [J].
Hindriks, Jean ;
Peralta, Susana ;
Weber, Shlomo .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (12) :2392-2402
[34]   The importance of government commitment in attracting firms: A dynamic analysis of tax competition in an agglomeration economy [J].
Kato, Hayato .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 74 :57-78
[35]   Small states and small states revisited [J].
Katzenstein, PJ .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 8 (01) :9-30
[36]   Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending [J].
Keen, M ;
Marchand, M .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1997, 66 (01) :33-53
[37]  
Keen M., 2003, J PUBLIC ECON THEORY, V5, P177, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9779.00129
[38]   Tax systems in the world: An empirical investigation into the importance of tax bases, administration costs, scale and political regime [J].
Kenny, Lawrence W. ;
Winer, Stanley L. .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2006, 13 (2-3) :181-215
[39]   Country portfolios [J].
Kraay, A ;
Servén, L ;
Loayza, N ;
Ventura, J .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2005, 3 (04) :914-945
[40]  
Kuznets S., 1960, EC CONSEQUENCES SIZE, P14, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-15210-0_2