Robotic Assisted Living Donor Nephrectomies: A Safe Alternative to Laparoscopic Technique for Kidney Transplant Donation

被引:18
作者
Spaggiari, Mario [1 ]
Garcia-Roca, Raquel [2 ]
Tulla, Kiara A. [1 ]
Okoye, Obi T. [1 ]
Di Bella, Caterina [1 ]
Oberholzer, Jose [3 ]
Jeon, Hoonbae [4 ]
Tzvetanov, Ivo G. [1 ]
Benedetti, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Charles O Strickler Transplant Ctr, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Dept Surg, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
donor obesity; laparoscopic; living donor; nephrectomy; outcomes; perioperative; robotic; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; LIVE; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004247
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To review outcomes after laparoscopic, robotic-assisted living donor nephrectomy (RLDN) in the first, and largest series reported to date.Summary of Background Data:Introduction of minimal invasive, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has increased live kidney donation, paving the way for further innovation to expand the donor pool with RLDN.Methods:Retrospective chart review of 1084 consecutive RLDNs performed between 2000 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical data, and complications were collected.Results:Six patients underwent conversion to open procedures between 2002 and 2005, whereas the remainder were successfully completed robotically. Median donor age was 35.7 (17.4) years, with a median BMI of 28.6 (7.7) kg/m(2). Nephrectomies were preferentially performed on the left side (95.2%). Multiple renal arteries were present in 24.1%. Median operative time was 159 (54) minutes, warm ischemia time 180 (90) seconds, estimated blood loss 50 (32) mL, and length of stay 3 (1) days. The median follow-up was 15 (28) months. Complications were reported in 216 patients (19.9%), of which 176 patients (81.5%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo class I and II). Duration of surgery, warm ischemia time, operative blood loss, conversion, and complication rates were not associated with increase in body mass index.Conclusion:RLDN is a safe technique and offers a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, in particular in donors with higher body mass index and multiple arteries. It offers transplant surgeons a platform to develop skills in robotic-assisted surgery needed in the more advanced setting of minimal invasive recipient operations.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 595
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open nephrectomies in living donors
    Rajab, A
    Mahoney, JE
    Henry, ML
    Elkhammas, EA
    Bumgardner, GL
    Ferguson, RM
    Pelletier, RP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 48 (02) : 123 - 130
  • [32] A Fast and Safe Living Donor "Finger-Assisted" Nephrectomy Technique: Results of 359 Cases
    Hakim, N.
    Aboutaleb, E.
    Syed, A.
    Rajagopal, P.
    Herbert, P.
    Canelo, R.
    Papalois, V.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (01) : 165 - 170
  • [33] How safe is hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?-025EFResults of 200 live donor nephrectomies by two different techniques
    Chandak, Pankaj
    Kessaris, Nicos
    Challacombe, Ben
    Olsburgh, Jonathan
    Calder, Francis
    Mamode, Nizam
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (01) : 293 - 297
  • [34] Minimally invasive robotic versus conventional open living donor kidney transplantation
    Pein, Ulrich
    Girndt, Matthias
    Markau, Silke
    Fritz, Annekathrin
    Breda, Alberto
    Stoeckle, Michael
    Mohammed, Nasreldin
    Kawan, Felix
    Schumann, Andre
    Fornara, Paolo
    Weigand, Karl
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (03) : 795 - 802
  • [35] Laparoscopic and robotic donor pancreatectomy for living donor pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation
    Oberholzer, Jose'
    Tzvetanov, Ivo
    Mele, Alessandra
    Benedetti, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2010, 17 (02) : 97 - 100
  • [36] Comparison of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantations with Living Related Donor Kidney Transplantation: Implications for National Kidney Paired Donation Program
    Kute, Vivek B.
    Gumber, Manoj R.
    Vanikar, Aruna V.
    Shah, Pankaj R.
    Patel, Himanshu V.
    Engineer, Divyesh P.
    Modi, Pranjal R.
    Rizvi, Jamal S.
    Shah, Veena R.
    Trivedi, Hargovind L.
    RENAL FAILURE, 2013, 35 (04) : 504 - 508
  • [37] Laparoscopic to robotic living donor nephrectomy: Is it time to change surgical technique?
    Papa, Sarah
    Popovic, Aleksandar
    Loerzel, Sharon
    Iskhagi, Samir
    Gallay, Brian
    Leggat, John
    Saidi, Reza
    Hod Dvorai, Reut
    Shahbazov, Rauf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2023, 19 (06)
  • [38] Ureteral Complications After Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy
    Gabr, Ahmed H.
    Sung, Randall S.
    Samaniego-Picota, Milagros D.
    He, Chang
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (07) : 788 - 792
  • [39] Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy with Transvaginal Extraction of the Kidney
    Pietrabissa, A.
    Abelli, M.
    Spinillo, A.
    Alessiani, M.
    Zonta, S.
    Ticozzelli, E.
    Peri, A.
    Dal Canton, A.
    Dionigi, P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 (12) : 2708 - 2711
  • [40] Evolution of robotic nephrectomy for living donation: from hand-assisted to totally robotic technique
    Giacomoni, Alessandro
    Di Sandro, Stefano
    Lauterio, Andrea
    Concone, Giacomo
    Mangoni, Iacopo
    Mihaylov, Plamen
    Tripepi, Matteo
    De Carlis, Luciano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2014, 10 (03) : 286 - 293