Robotic Assisted Living Donor Nephrectomies: A Safe Alternative to Laparoscopic Technique for Kidney Transplant Donation

被引:18
作者
Spaggiari, Mario [1 ]
Garcia-Roca, Raquel [2 ]
Tulla, Kiara A. [1 ]
Okoye, Obi T. [1 ]
Di Bella, Caterina [1 ]
Oberholzer, Jose [3 ]
Jeon, Hoonbae [4 ]
Tzvetanov, Ivo G. [1 ]
Benedetti, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Charles O Strickler Transplant Ctr, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Dept Surg, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
donor obesity; laparoscopic; living donor; nephrectomy; outcomes; perioperative; robotic; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; LIVE; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000004247
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To review outcomes after laparoscopic, robotic-assisted living donor nephrectomy (RLDN) in the first, and largest series reported to date.Summary of Background Data:Introduction of minimal invasive, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has increased live kidney donation, paving the way for further innovation to expand the donor pool with RLDN.Methods:Retrospective chart review of 1084 consecutive RLDNs performed between 2000 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical data, and complications were collected.Results:Six patients underwent conversion to open procedures between 2002 and 2005, whereas the remainder were successfully completed robotically. Median donor age was 35.7 (17.4) years, with a median BMI of 28.6 (7.7) kg/m(2). Nephrectomies were preferentially performed on the left side (95.2%). Multiple renal arteries were present in 24.1%. Median operative time was 159 (54) minutes, warm ischemia time 180 (90) seconds, estimated blood loss 50 (32) mL, and length of stay 3 (1) days. The median follow-up was 15 (28) months. Complications were reported in 216 patients (19.9%), of which 176 patients (81.5%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo class I and II). Duration of surgery, warm ischemia time, operative blood loss, conversion, and complication rates were not associated with increase in body mass index.Conclusion:RLDN is a safe technique and offers a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, in particular in donors with higher body mass index and multiple arteries. It offers transplant surgeons a platform to develop skills in robotic-assisted surgery needed in the more advanced setting of minimal invasive recipient operations.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 595
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Living Kidney Donation: Strategies to Increase the Donor Pool
    Lee, Lung-Yi
    Pham, Thomas A.
    Melcher, Marc L.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 99 (01) : 37 - +
  • [22] Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy in a Donor With Situs Inversus Totalis: It is Not a Contraindication to Kidney Transplant
    Liu, Congke
    Zhang, Fan
    Yin, Saifu
    Wang, Xianding
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2023, 55 (08) : 1896 - 1899
  • [23] Robotic assisted nephrectomy for living kidney donation (RANLD) with use of multiple locking clips or ligatures for renal vascular closure
    Brunotte, Maximilian
    Rademacher, Sebastian
    Weber, Justine
    Sucher, Elisabeth
    Lederer, Andri
    Hau, Hans-Michael
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Seehofer, Daniel
    Sucher, Robert
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [24] Technique Description and Outcomes of Robotic Transvaginal-Assisted Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
    Musquera Felip, Mireia
    Ajami Fardoun, Tarek
    Peri Cusi, Lluis
    Alcaraz Asensio, Antonio
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (1-2) : 148 - 154
  • [25] A decade of minimally invasive donation: experience with more than 1200 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies at a single institution
    Leventhal, Joseph R.
    Paunescu, Smaranda
    Baker, Talia B.
    Caciedo, Juan Carlos
    Skaro, Anton
    Kocak, Burak
    Gallon, Lorenzo
    Friedewald, John
    Luo, Xunrong
    Kaufman, Dixon B.
    Fryer, Jonathan P.
    Abecassis, Michael M.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [26] Living Kidney Donor Transplantation: An Alternative With Limitations
    Guerra, J.
    Melo, M. J.
    Santana, A.
    Goncalves, J.
    Nascimento, C.
    da Costa, A. G.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (04) : 898 - 902
  • [27] 200 consecutive hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: Evolution of operative technique and outcomes
    Fisher, PC
    Montgomery, JS
    Johnston, WK
    Wolf, JS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04) : 1439 - 1443
  • [28] Is laparoscopic donation safe for paediatric recipients? A study of 85 paediatric recipients comparing open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Chandak, Pankaj
    Kessaris, Nicos
    Durkan, Anne
    Owusu-Ansah, Nana
    Patel, Jigna
    Veitch, Peter
    McCarthy, Hugh
    Marks, Stephen D.
    Mamode, Nizam
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 27 (02) : 845 - 849
  • [29] Obese Kidney Donors in the Laparoscopic Living Nephrectomy Era: How Safe?
    Marcelino, Albertus
    Mochtar, Chaidir Arif
    Wahyudi, Irfan
    Hamid, Agus Rizal
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 21 : 297 - 300
  • [30] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Study in donors and recipients from 155 cases
    Leblanc, L.
    Lagrange, F.
    Ladriere, M.
    Frimat, L.
    Eschwege, P.
    Kessler, M.
    Hubert, J.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2019, 29 (12): : 596 - 602