Validity of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders

被引:72
|
作者
Koenig, Hans-Helmut [1 ]
Roick, Christiane [1 ]
Angermeyer, Matthias C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Dept Psychiat, Hlth Econ Res Unit, D-04317 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
EQ-5D; quality of life; schizophrenia; validity; EuroQol;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.08.004
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Purpose. - The EQ-5D is a generic questionnaire generating a health profile and a single index score for health-related quality of life. This study aimed to analyse the discriminative ability and validity of the EQ-5D in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders. Subjects and methods. - One hundred sixty-six patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders (ICD-10 F2) completed the EQ-5D. Measures of quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), utility (TTO), subjective (SCL-90R) and objective (PANSS, CGI-S) psychopathology, and functioning (GAF, GARF, SOFAS, HoNOS) provided comparison. Discriminative ability was analysed by assessing frequency distributions of EQ-5D scores. Validity of the EQ-5D self-classifier was analysed by assessing differences in related other scores grouped by response levels of EQ-5D items. Validity of the visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) and the EQ-5D index (UK social tariff) was analysed by assessing their correlation with all other scores. Results. - Seventy-nine percent of respondents reported problems in at least one of the EQ-5D dimensions (anxiety/depression 57%, usual activities 45%, pain/discomfort 44%, self-care 29%, mobility 22%). The mean EQ VAS score/EQ-5D index was 65.7/0.71. The four most frequently reported EQ-5D health states covered 45% of all respondents. For almost all EQ-5D dimensions, different response levels were associated with significantly different scores of measures used for comparison. Correlation of EQ VAS score and EQ-5D index were largest with scores of subjective measures (SCL-90R: -0.50 and -0.73; WHOQOL mental subscore 0.62 and 0.58; always P < 0.001). Discussion and conclusion. - The EQ-5D showed a moderate ceiling effect and seems to be reasonably valid in this patient group. (C) 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 187
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with anxiety disorders
    Koenig, Hans-Helmut
    Born, Anja
    Guenther, Oliver
    Matschinger, Herbert
    Heinrich, Sven
    Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.
    Angermeyer, Matthias C.
    Roick, Christiane
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8
  • [2] Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with somatoform disorders
    Christian Brettschneider
    Hans-Helmut König
    Wolfgang Herzog
    Claudia Kaufmann
    Rainer Schaefert
    Alexander Konnopka
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [3] Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with somatoform disorders
    Brettschneider, Christian
    Koenig, Hans-Helmut
    Herzog, Wolfgang
    Kaufmann, Claudia
    Schaefert, Rainer
    Konnopka, Alexander
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [4] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia
    Sonntag, Michael
    Konnopka, Alexander
    Leichsenring, Falk
    Salzer, Simone
    Beutel, Manfred E.
    Herpertz, Stephan
    Hiller, Wolfgang
    Hoyer, Juergen
    Joraschky, Peter
    Nolting, Bjoern
    Poehlmann, Karin
    Stangier, Ulrich
    Strauss, Bernhard
    Willutzki, Ulrike
    Wiltink, Joerg
    Leibing, Eric
    Koenig, Hans-Helmut
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [5] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with social phobia
    Michael Sonntag
    Alexander Konnopka
    Falk Leichsenring
    Simone Salzer
    Manfred E Beutel
    Stephan Herpertz
    Wolfgang Hiller
    Jürgen Hoyer
    Peter Joraschky
    Björn Nolting
    Karin Pöhlmann
    Ulrich Stangier
    Bernhard Strauss
    Ulrike Willutzki
    Jörg Wiltink
    Eric Leibing
    Hans-Helmut König
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [6] Acceptability and Validity of the EQ-5D in Patients Living With Dementia
    Michalowsky, Bernhard
    Xie, Feng
    Kohlmann, Thomas
    Graeske, Johannes
    Wuebbeler, Markus
    Thyrian, Jochen Rene
    Hoffmann, Wolfgang
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (06) : 760 - 767
  • [7] Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D for cancer patients in Korea
    Kim, Seon Ha
    Hwang, Jung Sung
    Kim, Tae Won
    Hong, Yong Sang
    Jo, Min-Woo
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (12) : 3155 - 3160
  • [8] Feasibility, validity and reliability of the Welsh version of the EQ-5D health status questionnaire
    Dyfrig A. Hughes
    Quality of Life Research, 2007, 16 : 1419 - 1423
  • [9] Feasibility, validity and reliability of the Welsh version of the EQ-5D health status questionnaire
    Hughes, Dyfrig A.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (08) : 1419 - 1423
  • [10] Valuing health using EQ-5D: The impact of chronic diseases on the stock of health
    Sanchez-Iriso, Eduardo
    Errea Rodriguez, Maria
    Cabases Hita, Juan Manuel
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (12) : 1402 - 1417