Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for people with end-stage heart failure: A systematic review and economic evaluation

被引:23
作者
Clegg, Andrew J.
Scott, David A.
Loveman, Emma
Colquitt, Jill
Royle, Pam
Bryant, Jackie
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Wessex Inst Hlth Res & Dev, Southampton Hlth Technol Assessments Ctr, Southampton SO16 7PX, Hants, England
[2] Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford OX2 OJJ, England
关键词
heart failure; left ventricular assist devices; systematic review; economic evaluation; health technology assessment;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462307070353
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for people with end-stage heart failure is assessed through a systematic review and economic evaluation. Methods: Systematic review was performed of randomized controlled trials, quasiexperimental studies, case series, and case studies identified through searching eighteen electronic databases, bibliographies, and consultation with experts and manufacturers. Studies assessed survival, functional capacity, and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness was assessed through a 5-year decision analytic model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for using left ventricular assist devices compared with usual care. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, showing that left ventricular assist devices appear beneficial, improving survival and quality of life. Adverse events are a serious concern. The economic evaluation showed that left ventricular assist devices had a cost per quality adjusted life year of 170,616 pound. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness was not sensitive to changes in costs or utility. Conclusions: Although left ventricular assist devices appear clinically effective as destination therapy, it is unlikely they will be cost-effective unless costs decrease or the benefits of their use increase.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 268
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UND SYST REV RES EFF
[2]  
Clegg AJ, 2005, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V9, P1
[3]   Orthotopic heart transplantation: highlights and limitations [J].
Deng, MC .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 84 (01) :243-+
[4]   Mechanical circulatory support for one thousand days or more with the novacor N100 left ventricular assist device [J].
Dohmen, PM ;
Laube, H ;
de Jonge, K ;
Baumann, G ;
Konertz, W .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 117 (05) :1029-1030
[5]  
Dohmen PM, 2001, TEX HEART I J, V28, P139
[6]  
Drummond MF, 2005, METHODS EC EVALUATIO
[7]   Preliminary experience with the LionHeart left ventricular assist device in patients with end-stage heart failure [J].
El-Banayosy, A ;
Arusoglu, L ;
Kizner, L ;
Morshuis, M ;
Tenderich, G ;
Pae, WE ;
Körfer, R .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 75 (05) :1469-1475
[8]   Research and development of an implantable, axial-flow left ventricular assist device: The Jarvik 2000 heart [J].
Frazier, OH ;
Myers, TJ ;
Jarvik, RK ;
Westaby, S ;
Pigott, DW ;
Gregoric, ID ;
Khan, T ;
Tamez, DW ;
Conger, JL ;
Macris, MP .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (03) :S125-S132
[9]   Initial clinical experience with the Jarvik 2000 implantable axial-flow left ventricular assist system [J].
Frazier, OH ;
Myers, TJ ;
Gregoric, ID ;
Khan, T ;
Delgado, R ;
Croitoru, M ;
Miller, K ;
Jarvik, R ;
Westaby, S .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (24) :2855-2860
[10]  
Frazier OH, 2003, ANN SURG, V237, P631, DOI 10.1097/00000658-200305000-00005