A multi-objective mixed-discrete particle swarm optimization with multi-domain diversity preservation

被引:15
作者
Tong, Weiyang [1 ]
Chowdhury, Souma [2 ]
Messac, Achille [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Dept Aerosp Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Diversity preservation; Mixed-discrete; PSO; Multi-objective; Wind farm layout optimization; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MOPSO;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-015-1319-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Among population-based optimization algorithms guided by meta-heuristics, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) has gained significant popularity in the past two decades, particularly due to its ease of implementation and fast convergence capabilities. This paper seeks to translate the beneficial features of PSO from solving typical continuous single-objective problems to solving multi-objective mixed-discrete problems, which is relatively a new ground for PSO application. The original Mixed-Discrete PSO (MDPSO) algorithm, which included an exclusive diversity preservation technique to significantly mitigate premature particle clustering, has been shown to be a powerful single-objective solver for highly constrained MINLP problems. This papers makes fundamental advancements to MDPSO, enabling it to solve complex multi-objective problems with mixed-discrete design variables. Specifically, in the velocity update equation for any particle, the explorative term is modified to point towards a stochastically selected non-dominated solution at that iteration - thereby adopting the concept of multi-leader swarms. The fractional domain in the diversity preservation technique, which was previously defined in terms of the best global particle, is now formulated as a function of the extreme members in the set of intermediate Pareto optimal solutions. With this advancement, diversity preservation not only mitigates premature particle stagnation, but also promotes more uniform coverage of the Pareto frontier. The multi-objective MDPSO algorithm is tested using a set of benchmark problems and a wind farm layout optimization problem. To illustrate the competitive benefits of the new MO-MDPSO algorithm, the results are compared with those given by other popular multi-objective solvers such as NSGA-II and SPEA.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 488
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, Int J Comput Intell Res, DOI DOI 10.5019/J.IJCIR.2006.68
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms
  • [3] [Anonymous], 43 TIK ETH COMP ENG
  • [4] Pareto optimality and particle swarm optimization
    Baumgartner, U
    Magele, C
    Renhart, W
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2004, 40 (02) : 1172 - 1175
  • [5] Binh T. T., 1997, TIRD INTERNA TIONA, P27
  • [6] Chen JZ, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5821, P400, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2_43
  • [7] Chowdhury Souma, 2009, International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, V1, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJMMNO.2009.030085
  • [8] A mixed-discrete Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm with explicit diversity-preservation
    Chowdhury, Souma
    Tong, Weiyang
    Messac, Achille
    Zhang, Jie
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 47 (03) : 367 - 388
  • [9] Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions
    Chowdhury, Souma
    Zhang, Jie
    Messac, Achille
    Castillo, Luciano
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 52 : 273 - 282
  • [10] Coello CAC, 2004, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V8, P256, DOI [10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067, 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067]