Genetic polymorphisms in mutagenesis progeny of Arabidopsis thaliana irradiated by carbon-ion beams and γ-rays irradiations

被引:10
|
作者
Chen, Xia [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Hui [1 ]
Du, Yan [1 ]
Luo, Shanwei [1 ]
Li, Wenjian [1 ]
Yu, Lixia [1 ]
Feng, Zhuo [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Libin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Modern Phys, Dept Biophys, Biomed Ctr, 509 Nanchang Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Seed Design, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Baiyin Innovat Acad Heavy Ion Bioind, Baiyin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon-ion beams; gamma-rays; Arabidopsis thaliana; ISSR; RAPD; DNA POLYMORPHISM; MOLECULAR NATURE; MUTATION-RATE; DIVERSITY; MUTANT; ACCESSIONS; COLOR; RAPD;
D O I
10.1080/09553002.2020.1688412
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: Heavy-ion beams and gamma-rays are popular physical mutagenesis to generate mutations in higher plants. It has been found that they show different mutation frequencies and spectrums of phenotype induction, however, the characteristics of heavy-ion beams on genetic polymorphism have not been clarified by comparing with gamma-rays. Materials and methods: In the present study, seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana were exposed to carbon-ion beams (with linear energy transfer (LET) of 50 keV/mu m) and gamma-rays (with average LET of 0.2 keV/mu m) irradiation. By using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, the genetic polymorphism of both M-1 and M-3 plants were investigated, respectively. Results: Carbon-ion beams induced relatively higher polymorphism rate in both M-1 and M-3 generation than gamma-rays: the polymorphism rates of M-1 plants derived from carbon-ion beams irradiation are 12.87% (ISSR-C) and 9.01% (RAPD-C), while are 7.67% (ISSR-gamma) and 1.45% (RAPD-gamma) of plants derived from gamma-rays. In M-3 generation, the polymorphism rates of ISSR-C, RAPD-C, ISSR-gamma, and RAPD-gamma are 17.64%, 22.79%, 12.10%, and 2.82%, respectively. Conclusions: In summary, the exposure to carbon-ion beams and gamma-rays lead to the change of genomic DNA of A. thaliana, which could be tested in M-1 plants and M-3 plants by ISSR and RAPD technology. So, both carbon-ion beams and gamma-rays can induce variations of genetic polymorphisms in M-1 plants and M-3 plants. The genetic polymorphisms of M-1 plants and M-3 plants induced by carbon-ion beams are higher than gamma-rays, indicating that heavy-ion beams irradiations mutation breeding is more advantageous than conventional ionizing radiations. Average molecular polymorphism of M-1 plants is lower than M-3 mutants, by nearly 4.77% (ISSR-C), 13.78% (RAPD-C), 4.43% (ISSR-gamma), and 1.37% (RAPD-gamma). We hope our study will provide basic information for understanding the effects of carbon-ion beams and gamma-rays for plant mutation breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 275
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Mutagenic effects of carbon-ion irradiation on dry Arabidopsis thaliana seeds
    Du, Yan
    Li, Wenjian
    Yu, Lixia
    Chen, Gang
    Liu, Qingfang
    Luo, Shanwei
    Shu, Qingyao
    Zhou, Libin
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2014, 759 : 28 - 36
  • [2] Mutational effects of γ-rays and carbon ion beams on Arabidopsis seedlings
    Yoshihara, Ryouhei
    Nozawa, Shigeki
    Hase, Yoshihiro
    Narumi, Issay
    Hidema, Jun
    Sakamoto, Ayako N.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (06) : 1050 - 1056
  • [3] Identification of Substitutions and Small Insertion-Deletions Induced by Carbon-Ion Beam Irradiation in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Du, Yan
    Luo, Shanwei
    Li, Xin
    Yang, Jiangyan
    Cui, Tao
    Li, Wenjian
    Yu, Lixia
    Feng, Hui
    Chen, Yuze
    Mu, Jinhu
    Chen, Xia
    Shu, Qingyao
    Guo, Tao
    Luo, Wenlong
    Zhou, Libin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [4] Role of carbon ion beams irradiation in mitigating cold stress in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Wang, Lin
    Ma, Ruonan
    Yin, Yue
    Jiao, Zhen
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2018, 162 : 341 - 347
  • [5] Triple channel analysis of Gafchromic EBT3 irradiated with clinical carbon-ion beams
    Holm, Kim Marina
    Yukihara, Eduardo G.
    Ahmed, Md Foiez
    Greilich, Steffen
    Jaekel, Oliver
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 123 - 130
  • [6] Antioxidant response of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings to oxidative stress induced by carbon ion beams irradiation
    Wang, Lin
    Ma, Ruonan
    Yin, Yue
    Jiao, Zhen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2018, 195 : 1 - 8
  • [7] Effects of carbon-ion beams on human pancreatic cancer cell lines that differ in genetic status
    Matsui, Y
    Asano, T
    Kenmochi, T
    Iwakawa, M
    Imai, T
    Ochiai, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2004, 27 (01): : 24 - 28
  • [8] Strategies for identification of mutations induced by carbon-ion beam irradiation in Arabidopsis thaliana by whole genome re-sequencing
    Du, Yan
    Luo, Shanwei
    Yu, Lixia
    Cui, Tao
    Chen, Xia
    Yang, Jiangyan
    Li, Xin
    Li, Wenjian
    Wang, Jufang
    Zhou, Libin
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2018, 807 : 21 - 30
  • [9] Evaluation of SCCVII tumor cell survival in clamped and non-clamped solid tumors exposed to carbon-ion beams in comparison to X-rays
    Hirayama, Ryoichi
    Uzawa, Akiko
    Takase, Nobuhiro
    Matsumoto, Yoshitaka
    Noguchi, Miho
    Koda, Kana
    Ozaki, Masakuni
    Yamashita, Kei
    Li, Huizi
    Kase, Yuki
    Matsufuji, Naruhiro
    Koike, Sachiko
    Masunaga, Shin-ichiro
    Ando, Koichi
    Okayasu, Ryuichi
    Furusawa, Yoshiya
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2013, 756 (1-2) : 146 - 151
  • [10] Relative biological effectiveness for cell-killing effect on various human cell lines irradiated with heavy-ion medical accelerator in CHIBA (HIMAC) carbon-ion beams
    Suzuki, M
    Kase, Y
    Yamaguchi, H
    Kanai, T
    Ando, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (01): : 241 - 250