A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research

被引:66
作者
Cook, Bryan G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
quantitative; research methodology; evidence-based practice; instructional evaluation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PUBLICATION BIAS; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ACTIVE CONSENT; CITATION BIAS; SCIENCE; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/0741932514528995
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Valid, scientific research is critical for ascertaining the effects of instructional techniques on learners with disabilities and for guiding effective special education practice and policy. Researchers in fields such as psychology and medicine have identified serious and widespread shortcomings in their research literatures related to replication and bias, leading many to question the validity of research findings in these fields. Replication and bias have not been systematically examined in special education research. In this article, I explore research on replication and bias conducted in other fields, discuss the likelihood that problems in replication and bias may exist in the special education research base, propose a research agenda for investigating replication and bias in special education research, and make initial recommendations for increasing replication and reducing bias in intervention studies in special education.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 246
页数:14
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [21] Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
    Dwan, Kerry
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Arnaiz, Juan A.
    Bloom, Jill
    Chan, An-Wen
    Cronin, Eugenia
    Decullier, Evelyne
    Easterbrook, Philippa J.
    Von Elm, Erik
    Gamble, Carrol
    Ghersi, Davina
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Simes, John
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (08):
  • [22] Uses and abuses of meta-analysis
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Sterne, JAC
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2001, 1 (06) : 478 - 484
  • [23] Replication research's disturbing trend
    Evanschitzky, Heiner
    Baumgarth, Carsten
    Hubbard, Raymond
    Armstrong, J. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2007, 60 (04) : 411 - 415
  • [24] How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
    Fanelli, Daniele
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (05):
  • [25] Reforming Science: Structural Reforms
    Fang, Ferric C.
    Casadevall, Arturo
    [J]. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2012, 80 (03) : 897 - 901
  • [26] Publication Bias in Psychological Science: Prevalence, Methods for Identifying and Controlling, and Implications for the Use of Meta-Analyses
    Ferguson, Christopher J.
    Brannick, Michael T.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 17 (01) : 120 - 128
  • [27] The Vaccine-Autism Connection: A Public Health Crisis Caused by Unethical Medical Practices and Fraudulent Science
    Flaherty, Dennis K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 45 (10) : 1302 - 1304
  • [28] The Psychology of Replication and Replication in Psychology
    Francis, Gregory
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (06) : 585 - 594
  • [29] Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology
    Francis, Gregory
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (02) : 151 - 156
  • [30] Parental Vaccine Safety Concerns in 2009
    Freed, Gary L.
    Clark, Sarah J.
    Butchart, Amy T.
    Singer, Dianne C.
    Davis, Matthew M.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2010, 125 (04) : 654 - 659