Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs

被引:58
作者
Gandhi, Anup A. [1 ,2 ]
Kode, Swathi [1 ,2 ]
DeVries, Nicole A. [1 ,2 ]
Grosland, Nicole M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smucker, Joseph D. [3 ]
Fredericks, Douglas C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Ctr Comp Aided Design, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
total disc replacement; arthroplasty; fusion; spine biomechanics; adjacent segment degeneration; BRYAN; PRESTIGE LP; arthrodesis; disc replacement plus fusion; range of motion; hybrid loading; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; INTERBODY FUSION; SPINE; ARTHROPLASTY; ADJACENT; RADICULOPATHY; ARTHRODESIS; DISKECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study comparing arthroplasty with fusion using human cadaveric C2-T1 spines. Objective. To compare the kinematics of the cervical spine after arthroplasty and fusion using single level, 2 level and hybrid constructs. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have shown that spinal levels adjacent to a fusion experience increased motion and higher stress which may lead to adjacent segment disc degeneration. Cervical arthroplasty achieves similar decompression but preserves the motion at the operated level, potentially decreasing the occurrence of adjacent segment disc degeneration. Methods. 11 specimens (C2-T1) were divided into 2 groups (BRYAN and PRESTIGE LP). The specimens were tested in the following order; intact, single level total disc replacement (TDR) at C5-C6, 2-level TDR at C5-C6-C7, fusion at C5-C6 and TDR at C6-C7 (Hybrid construct), and lastly a 2-level fusion. The intact specimens were tested up to a moment of 2.0 Nm. After each surgical intervention, the specimens were loaded until the primary motion (C2-T1) matched the motion of the respective intact state (hybrid control). Results. An arthroplasty preserved motion at the implanted level and maintained normal motion at the nonoperative levels. Arthrodesis resulted in a significant decrease in motion at the fused level and an increase in motion at the unfused levels. In the hybrid construct, the TDR adjacent to fusion preserved motion at the arthroplasty level, thereby reducing the demand on the other levels. Conclusion. Cervical disc arthroplasty with both the BRYAN and PRESTIGE LP discs not only preserved the motion at the operated level, but also maintained the normal motion at the adjacent levels. Under simulated physiologic loading, the motion patterns of the spine with the BRYAN or PRESTIGE LP disc were very similar and were closer than fusion to the intact motion pattern. An adjacent segment disc replacement is biomechanically favorable to a fusion in the presence of a pre-existing fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:1578 / 1585
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease A Cochrane Review
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : E1096 - E1107
  • [42] Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Hua
    Cheng, Lei
    Hou, Yong
    Liu, Yi
    Liu, Ben
    Mundra, Jyoti Joshi
    Nie, Lin
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (01) : 101 - 112
  • [43] Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C
    Lou, Jigang
    Li, Huibo
    Rong, Xin
    Wu, Wenjie
    Liu, Hao
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2016, 50 (03) : 339 - 345
  • [44] Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Hybrid Total Disc Replacement for Bilevel Pathology with Cervical Radiculopathy/Myelopathy: A Comparative Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up in an Indian Population
    Sharma, Jeevan Kumar
    Varma, Kalidindi Kalyan Kumar
    Mallepally, Abhinandan Reddy
    Marathe, Nandan
    Rustagi, Tarush
    Mohapatra, Bibhudendu
    Yadav, Padmini
    Das, Kalidutta
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (04) : 493 - 501
  • [45] Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Tracey, Robert W.
    Cody, John P.
    Gaume, Rachel E.
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (07) : 681 - 688
  • [46] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dynamic cervical implant replacement for treatment of single-level degenerative cervical disc disease: a 24-month follow-up
    Wang, Lei
    Song, Yue-ming
    Liu, Li-ming
    Liu, Hao
    Li, Tao
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (08) : 1680 - 1687
  • [47] Index and Adjacent Level Kinematics After Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Fusion In Vivo Quantitative Radiographic Analysis
    Park, Daniel K.
    Lin, Eric L.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (09) : 721 - 730
  • [48] Safety and Outcome of Outpatient 2-Level Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion plus Adjacent Total Disc Replacement
    Chin, K. R.
    Pencle, F. J. R.
    Coombs, A. V.
    Seale, J. A.
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 66 (03) : 440 - 444
  • [49] Biomechanical Analysis of the Cervical Spine Following Disc Degeneration, Disc Fusion, and Disc Replacement: A Finite Element Study
    Gandhi, Anup A.
    Grosland, Nicole M.
    Kallemeyn, Nicole A.
    Kode, Swathi
    Fredericks, Douglas C.
    Smucker, Joseph D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 13 (06) : 491 - 500
  • [50] Is Cervical Disc Replacement Valuable in 3-Level Hybrid Surgery Compared with 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?
    Wang, Han
    Huang, Kangkang
    Liu, Hao
    Meng, Yang
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Ding, Chen
    Hong, Ying
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 146 : E151 - E160