Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs

被引:58
作者
Gandhi, Anup A. [1 ,2 ]
Kode, Swathi [1 ,2 ]
DeVries, Nicole A. [1 ,2 ]
Grosland, Nicole M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smucker, Joseph D. [3 ]
Fredericks, Douglas C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Ctr Comp Aided Design, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
total disc replacement; arthroplasty; fusion; spine biomechanics; adjacent segment degeneration; BRYAN; PRESTIGE LP; arthrodesis; disc replacement plus fusion; range of motion; hybrid loading; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; INTERBODY FUSION; SPINE; ARTHROPLASTY; ADJACENT; RADICULOPATHY; ARTHRODESIS; DISKECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study comparing arthroplasty with fusion using human cadaveric C2-T1 spines. Objective. To compare the kinematics of the cervical spine after arthroplasty and fusion using single level, 2 level and hybrid constructs. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have shown that spinal levels adjacent to a fusion experience increased motion and higher stress which may lead to adjacent segment disc degeneration. Cervical arthroplasty achieves similar decompression but preserves the motion at the operated level, potentially decreasing the occurrence of adjacent segment disc degeneration. Methods. 11 specimens (C2-T1) were divided into 2 groups (BRYAN and PRESTIGE LP). The specimens were tested in the following order; intact, single level total disc replacement (TDR) at C5-C6, 2-level TDR at C5-C6-C7, fusion at C5-C6 and TDR at C6-C7 (Hybrid construct), and lastly a 2-level fusion. The intact specimens were tested up to a moment of 2.0 Nm. After each surgical intervention, the specimens were loaded until the primary motion (C2-T1) matched the motion of the respective intact state (hybrid control). Results. An arthroplasty preserved motion at the implanted level and maintained normal motion at the nonoperative levels. Arthrodesis resulted in a significant decrease in motion at the fused level and an increase in motion at the unfused levels. In the hybrid construct, the TDR adjacent to fusion preserved motion at the arthroplasty level, thereby reducing the demand on the other levels. Conclusion. Cervical disc arthroplasty with both the BRYAN and PRESTIGE LP discs not only preserved the motion at the operated level, but also maintained the normal motion at the adjacent levels. Under simulated physiologic loading, the motion patterns of the spine with the BRYAN or PRESTIGE LP disc were very similar and were closer than fusion to the intact motion pattern. An adjacent segment disc replacement is biomechanically favorable to a fusion in the presence of a pre-existing fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:1578 / 1585
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Cervical Kinematics, Pain, and Functional Disability Between Single- and Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Chien, Andy
    Lai, Dar-Ming
    Wang, Shwu-Fen
    Hsu, Wei-Li
    Cheng, Chih-Hsiu
    Wang, Jaw-Lin
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (15) : E915 - E922
  • [32] Incorporating strategy in hybrid surgery for continuous two-level cervical spondylosis from a biomechanical perspective
    Tang, Beichuan
    Yang, Jiemeng
    Zhang, Yingying
    Ren, Xianjun
    Jiang, Tao
    Mo, Zhongjun
    Fan, Yubo
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2022, 226
  • [33] Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases
    Mo, Zhongjun
    Li, Qi
    Jia, Zhiwei
    Yang, Jiemeng
    Wong, Duo Wai-Chi
    Fan, Yubo
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (04) : 1181 - 1190
  • [34] Adjacent level effects of bi level disc replacement, hi level fusion and disc replacement plus fusion in cervical spine- a finite element based study
    Faizan, Ahmad
    Goel, Vijay K.
    Biyani, Ashok
    Garfin, Steven R.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (03) : 226 - 233
  • [35] Biomechanical Analysis of the Range of Motion After Placement of a Two-Level Cervical ProDisc-C Versus Hybrid Construct
    Cho, Bo Young
    Lim, Jesse
    Sim, Hong Bo
    Park, Jon
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : 1769 - 1776
  • [36] Vertebral body split fracture after a single-level cervical total disc replacement Case report
    Tu, Tsung-Hsi
    Wu, Jau-Ching
    Fay, Li-Yu
    Ko, Chin-Chu
    Huang, Wen-Cheng
    Cheng, Henrich
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [37] Comparisons of Safety and Clinical Outcomes Between Multiple-level and Single-level Cervical Disk Replacement for Cervical Spondylosis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jiang, Lianghai
    Tan, Mingsheng
    Yang, Feng
    Yi, Ping
    Tang, Xiangsheng
    Hao, Qingying
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (10): : 419 - 426
  • [38] Costs of Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease An Analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence Database for Acute and Long-term Costs and Complications
    Radcliff, Kris
    Zigler, Jeff
    Zigler, Jack
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (08) : 521 - 529
  • [39] Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study
    Cheng, Lei
    Nie, Lin
    Zhang, Li
    Hou, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 1347 - 1351
  • [40] Biomechanical analysis of single- and double-level cervical disc arthroplasty using finite element modeling
    Rahman, Waseemur Ur
    Jiang, Wei
    Zhao, Fulin
    Li, Zhijun
    Wang, Guohua
    Yang, Guanghui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 237 (01) : 91 - 103