A hidden harvest from semi-arid forests: landscape-level livelihood contributions in Zagros, Iran

被引:7
作者
Mahdavi, Ali [1 ]
Wunder, Sven [2 ,3 ]
Mirzaeizadeh, Vahid [1 ]
Omidi, Mehdi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Fac Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Forest Sci, Ilam, Iran
[2] European Forest Inst EFI, DSc, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Lima, Peru
[4] Univ Ilam, Fac Sci, Dept Math & Stat, Ilam, Iran
关键词
Indirect incomes; NTFP; livestock; household economy; grazing; Ilam; RURAL LIVELIHOODS; POVERTY; CONSERVATION; DEPENDENCE; HOUSEHOLDS; INCOME;
D O I
10.1080/14728028.2019.1571447
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In a forest-scarce country like Iran, the open semi-arid Zagros forests are the single-most important forest region, yet their contribution to rural livelihoods remains inadequately understood. Here our primary focus is on analyzing the quantitative contributions of these oak-pistachio tree savannas to rural household incomes in Malekshahi County, Ilam Province, considering both cash and subsistence sources, and direct as well as indirect incomes. Direct forest-extractive incomes prove to be comparatively small (6% of household incomes), and are dominated by foods (wild vegetables, pistachios, and fruits), fuels, and livestock feeds. However, forest incomes are egalitarian in distribution, and strategic in their nature: they keep one-fifth of households from falling below the poverty line. The poorest are thus also more forest- and firewood-reliant, but more surprisingly, so are specialized pastoralists. Moreover, indirect benefits in terms of forest inputs into agriculture are crucial: 20-25% of the crops are planted in tree savannas generating 7-9% of household incomes. All forests support goat and sheep grazing in the dry season as a vital refuge of vegetation resources, likely with an even higher value of household income (around 10%). Future research should look closer into those forest-farm linkages.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 125
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adeli, 2008, 16405189 UN FAO
[2]   Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal [J].
Adhikari, B ;
Di Falco, S ;
Lovett, JC .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (02) :245-257
[3]   Poverty, property rights and collective action: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management [J].
Adhikari, H .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 10 :7-31
[4]   Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis [J].
Angelsen, Arild ;
Jagger, Pamela ;
Babigumira, Ronnie ;
Belcher, Brian ;
Hogarth, Nicholas J. ;
Bauch, Simone ;
Boerner, Jan ;
Smith-Hall, Carsten ;
Wunder, Sven .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 64 :S12-S28
[5]  
Aung P. S., 2015, Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, V24, P190, DOI 10.1080/14728028.2014.976597
[6]   Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia [J].
Babulo, Bedru ;
Muys, Bart ;
Nega, Fredu ;
Tollens, Eric ;
Nyssen, Jan ;
Deckers, Jozef ;
Mathijs, Erik .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 98 (02) :147-155
[7]  
Bullock Stephen H., 1995, P277, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511753398.011
[8]  
Bwalya S.M, 2013, Zambia Soc. Sci. J., V2, P67
[9]   Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: Evidence from Zimbabwe [J].
Cavendish, W .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (11) :1979-2003
[10]  
Chileshe RA., 2005, THESIS