Hand antisepsis: Evaluanon of a sprayer system for alcohol distribution

被引:9
作者
Barrau, K
Rovery, C
Drancourt, M
Brouqui, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Nord, Serv Malad Infect & Trop, F-13015 Marseille, France
[2] Assistance Publ Hop Marseille, Hotel Dieu, Comite Lutte Infect Nosocomiales, Marseille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1086/502189
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of a new alcohol sprayer by comparing it with an individual bottle of alcohol. Patterns of use and perceptions among healthcare personnel were compared for the two products. DESIGN: Observational study recording the volume of alcohol used and the compliance rate (frequency of hand antisepsis per number of opportunities), and a survey of healthcare workers' perceptions of the different hand hygiene strategies. SETTING: A 20-bed medical unit in a public hospital in Marseille, France. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers of an infectious disease unit. INTERVENTIONS: Hand hygiene alcohol systems (sprayer vs individual bottle, 70% ethyl alcohol). RESULTS: The sprayer was used more frequently than the individual bottle (12.6 vs 9.7 hand washes per day). With the sprayer system, compliance was 91% for physicians, 28% for nurses, and 8% for housekeeping personnel. Alcohol hand antisepsis was preferred to washing hands with soap and water in low-risk situations such as simple entrance into a room (91% vs 36%; P < 10(-6)) or simple contact with a patient (69% vs 40%; P < .005).The sprayer system was considered easier to use (950/6), more hygienic (95%), and faster (92%), with a better tolerance than the individual bottle. CONCLUSION: The new alcohol sprayer should improve rapid hand antisepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 183
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Handwashing compliance by health care workers -: The impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic [J].
Bischoff, WE ;
Reynolds, TM ;
Sessler, CN ;
Edmond, MB ;
Wenzel, RP .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (07) :1017-1021
[2]   It is time for action: Improving hand hygiene in hospitals [J].
Boyce, JM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 130 (02) :153-155
[3]   ALCOHOL-IMPREGNATED WIPES AS AN ALTERNATIVE IN HAND HYGIENE [J].
BUTZ, AM ;
LAUGHON, BE ;
GULLETTE, DL ;
LARSON, EL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1990, 18 (02) :70-76
[4]  
Cookson B, 1999, BRIT MED J, V318, P686
[5]   USEFUL AND USELESS HYGIENIC TECHNIQUES IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS [J].
DASCHNER, FD .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 11 (06) :280-283
[6]   COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF ALTERNATIVE HAND-WASHING AGENTS IN REDUCING NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS [J].
DOEBBELING, BN ;
STANLEY, GL ;
SHEETZ, CT ;
PFALLER, MA ;
HOUSTON, AK ;
ANNIS, L ;
LI, N ;
WENZEL, RP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (02) :88-93
[7]  
Dyer D L, 1998, AORN J, V68, P239, DOI 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62517-9
[8]  
GARNER JS, 1985, INFECT CONTROL, V7, P231
[9]   Handwashing - The Semmelweis lesson misunderstood? [J].
Harbarth, S .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 30 (06) :990-991
[10]   INFECTION CONTROL IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS - UK NATIONAL SURVEY [J].
INGLIS, TJJ ;
SPROAT, LJ ;
HAWKEY, PM ;
KNAPPETT, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 68 (02) :216-220