Screening for retinopathy of prematurity:: Is it painful?

被引:65
作者
Belda, S
Pallás, CR
De la Cruz, J
Tejada, P
机构
[1] Hosp Doce Octubre, Div Neonatol Unit, Clin Epidemiol Unit, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Doce Octubre, Dept Pediat, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Doce Octubre, Div Neonatol, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Doce Octubre, Div Ophthalmol, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
来源
BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE | 2004年 / 86卷 / 03期
关键词
pain measurement; diagnostic techniques; ophthalmological; retinopathy of prematurity; infant; premature;
D O I
10.1159/000079542
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Screening programmes for retinopathy of prematurity have shown to reduce unfavourable visual outcome and to be cost-effective. Following present recommendations, almost 1% of all newborn babies should therefore be screened and undergo at least one ophthalmologic examination. This is a skilled procedure that requires drug instillation and manipulation of the ocular globe with scleral indentation. The objective of this study is to describe the side effects of this ophthalmic exam with special focus on the occurrence of pain. Methods: This was an observational study with a before-after analysis where all neonates undergoing an ophthalmologic exam during a 4-month period in a third level hospital were included. CRIES pain score was determined before the exam, 5 min after and 24 h after the screening manoeuvre. Blood pressure and pulse rate were determined in addition to the mentioned measurements 30 min after the ophthalmologic examination. Minimum oxygen saturation, apnoeas, gastrointestinal side effects ( like vomiting and gastric aspirates), the need for respiratory assistance or for intensive care unit admission were recorded within 24 h before and after the procedure. Results: 27 preterm neonates underwent an ophthalmologic examination and were included in the study. CRIES pain score was significantly higher 5 min after and 24 h after the screening procedure than before. This difference was also observed after stratification for birth weight and gestational age. No other study variable modified this time effect. No significant changes in blood pressure and pulse rate were shown after the ophthalmic exam. Vomiting was present in 4% of the newborns, gastric aspirates in 22% and apnoeas in 41% after the examination. Ten percent of the explored preterm babies needed increased respiratory assistance and 4% had to be transferred from the intermediate care unit to the intensive care because of severe apnoeas. Comments: An increase in pain score was shown after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination. Physiologic variable changes do not last long enough to evaluate the impact of certain procedures. Multivariate pain scores ( like CRIES) should be used in everyday practice. It seems that the ophthalmologic examination in preterm babies might be painful and further studies should identify the best strategy to prevent pain during the retinopathy of prematurity screening manoeuvre. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 200
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Correlation between hyperglycemia and retinopathy of prematurity
    Ahmadpour-Kacho, Mousa
    Motlagh, Alireza Jashni
    Rasoulinejad, Seyed Ahmad
    Jahangir, Tahereh
    Bijani, Ali
    Pasha, Yadollah Zahed
    [J]. PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 56 (05) : 726 - 730
  • [32] Towards a universal approach for screening of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)
    SchalijDelfos, NE
    Zijlmans, BLM
    Cats, BP
    [J]. DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1996, 92 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [33] Are we screening too many babies for retinopathy of prematurity?
    Goble, RR
    Jones, HS
    Fielder, AR
    [J]. EYE, 1997, 11 (4) : 509 - 514
  • [34] Use of digital retinal imaging in screening for retinopathy of prematurity
    Kandasamy, Yogavijayan
    Smith, Roger
    Wright, Ian
    Hartley, Leo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (01) : E1 - E5
  • [35] Review of the Use of Digital Imaging in Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening
    Salcone, Erin M.
    Johnston, Suzanne
    VanderVeen, Deborah
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 25 (5-6) : 214 - 217
  • [36] Results of Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity: How the Ideal Screening Program Should Be?
    Esen, Ebru
    Erdem, Elif
    Yar, Kemal
    Demircan, Nihal
    Soylu, Merih
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 44 (01): : 42 - 46
  • [37] Screening for retinopathy of prematurity:a report from upper Egypt
    Mahmoud M.Nassar
    [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016, (02) : 262 - 265
  • [38] Retinopathy of prematurity. Prevention, screening and treatment guidelines
    Castro Conde, J. R.
    Echaniz Urcelay, I.
    Botet Mussons, F.
    Pallas Alonso, C. R.
    Narbona, E.
    Sanchez Luna, M.
    [J]. ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2009, 71 (06): : 514 - 523
  • [39] Retinopathy of prematurity in the UKI: The organisation of services for screening and treatment
    Haines, L
    Fielder, AR
    Scrivener, R
    Wilkinson, AR
    Pollock, JI
    [J]. EYE, 2002, 16 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [40] Retinopathy of Prematurity in the Dominican Republic: Challenges to Screening and Prevention
    Lee, Jennifer W.
    SilfaMazara, Francheyska
    Olivier, Ana
    McCabe, Francis
    Rivera, Luis
    Martin, Rosina Negrin
    Davis, Jonathan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 29 (10) : 801 - 806