Screening for retinopathy of prematurity:: Is it painful?

被引:65
作者
Belda, S
Pallás, CR
De la Cruz, J
Tejada, P
机构
[1] Hosp Doce Octubre, Div Neonatol Unit, Clin Epidemiol Unit, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Doce Octubre, Dept Pediat, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Doce Octubre, Div Neonatol, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Doce Octubre, Div Ophthalmol, ES-28041 Madrid, Spain
来源
BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE | 2004年 / 86卷 / 03期
关键词
pain measurement; diagnostic techniques; ophthalmological; retinopathy of prematurity; infant; premature;
D O I
10.1159/000079542
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Screening programmes for retinopathy of prematurity have shown to reduce unfavourable visual outcome and to be cost-effective. Following present recommendations, almost 1% of all newborn babies should therefore be screened and undergo at least one ophthalmologic examination. This is a skilled procedure that requires drug instillation and manipulation of the ocular globe with scleral indentation. The objective of this study is to describe the side effects of this ophthalmic exam with special focus on the occurrence of pain. Methods: This was an observational study with a before-after analysis where all neonates undergoing an ophthalmologic exam during a 4-month period in a third level hospital were included. CRIES pain score was determined before the exam, 5 min after and 24 h after the screening manoeuvre. Blood pressure and pulse rate were determined in addition to the mentioned measurements 30 min after the ophthalmologic examination. Minimum oxygen saturation, apnoeas, gastrointestinal side effects ( like vomiting and gastric aspirates), the need for respiratory assistance or for intensive care unit admission were recorded within 24 h before and after the procedure. Results: 27 preterm neonates underwent an ophthalmologic examination and were included in the study. CRIES pain score was significantly higher 5 min after and 24 h after the screening procedure than before. This difference was also observed after stratification for birth weight and gestational age. No other study variable modified this time effect. No significant changes in blood pressure and pulse rate were shown after the ophthalmic exam. Vomiting was present in 4% of the newborns, gastric aspirates in 22% and apnoeas in 41% after the examination. Ten percent of the explored preterm babies needed increased respiratory assistance and 4% had to be transferred from the intermediate care unit to the intensive care because of severe apnoeas. Comments: An increase in pain score was shown after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination. Physiologic variable changes do not last long enough to evaluate the impact of certain procedures. Multivariate pain scores ( like CRIES) should be used in everyday practice. It seems that the ophthalmologic examination in preterm babies might be painful and further studies should identify the best strategy to prevent pain during the retinopathy of prematurity screening manoeuvre. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 200
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SCREENING FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER SURFACTANT TREATMENT
    BRUNNERDIPIETRO, D
    BOSSI, E
    KOERNER, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1995, 154 (09) : S90 - S94
  • [22] Alternative mydriasis techniques for retinopathy of prematurity screening
    Seliniotaki, Aikaterini K.
    Prousali, Efthymia
    Lithoxopoulou, Maria
    Kokkali, Stamatia
    Ziakas, Nikolaos
    Soubasi, Vasiliki
    Mataftsi, Asimina
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 40 (12) : 3613 - 3619
  • [23] Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity
    Lichtenstein, SJ
    Buckley, EG
    Ellis, GS
    Kivlin, JD
    Lueder, GT
    Ruben, JB
    Denslow, GT
    Redmond, MR
    Repka, MX
    Alexander, SN
    Flynn, J
    Good, W
    Phelps, DL
    Reynolds, J
    Saunders, R
    PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (02) : 572 - 576
  • [24] Screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity
    Fierson, Walter M.
    Saunders, Richard A.
    Good, William
    Palmer, Earl A.
    Phelps, Dale
    Reynolds, James
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Ruben, James B.
    Granet, David B.
    Blocker, Richard J.
    Bradford, Geoffrey E.
    Karr, Daniel J.
    Lueder, Gregg T.
    Lehman, Sharon S.
    Siatkowski, R. Michael
    PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (01) : 189 - 195
  • [25] Current screening and treatments in retinopathy of prematurity in the US
    Suelves, Ana M.
    Shulman, Julia P.
    EYE AND BRAIN, 2016, 8 : 37 - 43
  • [26] Screening and treatments using telemedicine in retinopathy of prematurity
    Thanos, Aristomenis
    Yonekawa, Yoshihiro
    Todorich, Bozho
    Moshfeghi, Darius M.
    Trese, Michael T.
    EYE AND BRAIN, 2016, 8 : 147 - 151
  • [27] Screening program in Michoacan State for Retinopathy of prematurity
    Citlali Lara-Molina, Norma
    Antonio Ramirez-Ortiz, Marco
    Rios-Medina, Sergio
    Joana Mendez-Ochoa, Karol
    Teresa Tinoco-Zamudio, Maria
    GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO, 2013, 149 (03): : 280 - 285
  • [28] Reliability of retinal imaging screening in retinopathy of prematurity
    Navarro-Blanco, C.
    Peralta-Calvo, J.
    Pastora-Salvador, N.
    Alvarez-Rementeria, L.
    Chamorro, E.
    Sanchez-Ramos, C.
    ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2014, 81 (03): : 149 - 154
  • [29] Alternative mydriasis techniques for retinopathy of prematurity screening
    Aikaterini K. Seliniotaki
    Efthymia Prousali
    Maria Lithoxopoulou
    Stamatia Kokkali
    Nikolaos Ziakas
    Vasiliki Soubasi
    Asimina Mataftsi
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 3613 - 3619
  • [30] Screening and novel therapies for retinopathy of prematurity - A review
    Hellstrom, Ann
    Hard, Anna-Lena
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 138