ProPSA and the Prostate Health Index as predictive markers for aggressiveness in low-risk prostate cancer-results from an international multicenter study

被引:27
作者
Heidegger, I. [1 ]
Klocker, H. [1 ]
Pichler, R. [1 ]
Pircher, A. [2 ]
Prokop, W. [3 ]
Steiner, E. [1 ]
Ladurner, C. [4 ]
Comploj, E. [4 ]
Lunacek, A. [5 ]
Djordjevic, D. [6 ]
Pycha, A. [4 ]
Plas, E. [5 ]
Horninger, W. [1 ]
Bektic, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Urol, Anichst 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Internal Med 5, Hematol & Oncol, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Lab & Chem Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Hosp Bolzano, Dept Urol, Bolzano, Italy
[5] Hanusch Hosp Wien, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[6] Dept Urol, Klin Ctr Srbije Beograd, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; PSA LEVELS; ANTIGEN; RECLASSIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; PERCENTAGE; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2017.3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in prostate cancer (PCa) treatment is distinguishing insignificant PCa from those forms that need active treatment. We evaluated the impact of PSA isoforms on risk stratification in patients with low-risk PCa as well as in active surveillance (AS) candidates who underwent radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score (GS) 6 PCa of four different international institutions were prospectively enrolled in the study. Blood withdrawal was performed the day before radical prostatectomy. In addition, patients were classified according to the EAU and NCCN criteria for AS candidates. PSA, free PSA (fPSA) and proPSA were measured using dual monoclonal antibody sandwich immunoassays. In addition, the Prostate Health Index (PHI = proPSA/fPSA x root PSA) was calculated. Final histology of the radical prostatectomy specimens was correlated to PSA, its isoforms and PHI. RESULTS: Serum proPSA levels were significantly elevated in those patients with an upgrade in final histology (GS. 7). In addition, higher proPSA levels were predictive for extraprostatic extension (>= pT3a) as well as for positive surgical margins. Interestingly, PHI had an even higher predictive power when compared with proPSA alone concerning GS upgrading, extraprostatic extension and surgical margins in both the total and the AS patient group. CONCLUSION: We showed in a multicenter study that proPSA is a valuable biomarker to detect patients with aggressive PCa in a cohort of GS 6 patients, who would benefit from active tumor therapy. Combining proPSA with the standard markers PSA and fPSA using PHI further increases the predictive accuracy significantly. Moreover, our data support the use of PHI for monitoring PCa patients under AS.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, UROL ONCOL
  • [2] Tyrol Prostate Cancer Demonstration Project: Early detection, treatment, outcome, incidence and mortality
    Bartsch, Georg
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Klocker, Helmut
    Pelzer, Alexandre
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Oberaigner, Wilhelm
    Schennach, Harald
    Schaefer, Georg
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    Boniol, Mathieu
    Severi, Gianluca
    Robertson, Chris
    Boyle, Peter
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (07) : 809 - 816
  • [3] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines
    Bruinsma, Sophie M.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Petrides, Neophytos
    Weerakoon, Mahesha
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (03) : 151 - 167
  • [4] Use of percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to identify men at high risk of prostate cancer when PSA levels are 2.51 to 4 ng/mL and digital rectal examination is not suspicious for prostate cancer: An alternative model
    Catalona, WJ
    Partin, AW
    Finlay, JA
    Chan, DW
    Rittenhouse, HG
    Wolfert, RL
    Woodrum, DL
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [5] Prostate Health Index and %p2PSA Predict Aggressive Prostate Cancer Pathology in Chinese Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
    Lai, Fernand Mac-Moune
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Lee, Wai-Man
    Yee, Chi-Hang
    Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin
    Hou, See-Ming
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (08) : 2707 - 2714
  • [6] Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Filella, Xavier
    Gimenez, Nuria
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 51 (04) : 729 - 739
  • [7] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Frye, Thomas P.
    George, Arvin K.
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Maruf, Mahir
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Muthigi, Akhil
    Han, Hui
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Brad
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (03) : 640 - 646
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates with low-risk prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis
    Guo, R.
    Cai, L.
    Fan, Y.
    Jin, J.
    Zhou, L.
    Zhang, K.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2015, 18 (03) : 221 - 228
  • [9] Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.
    Haese A.
    Graefen M.
    Huland H.
    Lilja H.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2004, 5 (3) : 231 - 240
  • [10] [-2]proPSA is an early marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness
    Heidegger, I.
    Klocker, H.
    Steiner, E.
    Skradski, V.
    Ladurner, M.
    Pichler, R.
    Schaefer, G.
    Horninger, W.
    Bektic, J.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2014, 17 (01) : 70 - 74