ProPSA and the Prostate Health Index as predictive markers for aggressiveness in low-risk prostate cancer-results from an international multicenter study

被引:28
作者
Heidegger, I. [1 ]
Klocker, H. [1 ]
Pichler, R. [1 ]
Pircher, A. [2 ]
Prokop, W. [3 ]
Steiner, E. [1 ]
Ladurner, C. [4 ]
Comploj, E. [4 ]
Lunacek, A. [5 ]
Djordjevic, D. [6 ]
Pycha, A. [4 ]
Plas, E. [5 ]
Horninger, W. [1 ]
Bektic, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Urol, Anichst 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Internal Med 5, Hematol & Oncol, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Lab & Chem Med, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Hosp Bolzano, Dept Urol, Bolzano, Italy
[5] Hanusch Hosp Wien, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[6] Dept Urol, Klin Ctr Srbije Beograd, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; PSA LEVELS; ANTIGEN; RECLASSIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; PERCENTAGE; DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2017.3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in prostate cancer (PCa) treatment is distinguishing insignificant PCa from those forms that need active treatment. We evaluated the impact of PSA isoforms on risk stratification in patients with low-risk PCa as well as in active surveillance (AS) candidates who underwent radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A total of 112 patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score (GS) 6 PCa of four different international institutions were prospectively enrolled in the study. Blood withdrawal was performed the day before radical prostatectomy. In addition, patients were classified according to the EAU and NCCN criteria for AS candidates. PSA, free PSA (fPSA) and proPSA were measured using dual monoclonal antibody sandwich immunoassays. In addition, the Prostate Health Index (PHI = proPSA/fPSA x root PSA) was calculated. Final histology of the radical prostatectomy specimens was correlated to PSA, its isoforms and PHI. RESULTS: Serum proPSA levels were significantly elevated in those patients with an upgrade in final histology (GS. 7). In addition, higher proPSA levels were predictive for extraprostatic extension (>= pT3a) as well as for positive surgical margins. Interestingly, PHI had an even higher predictive power when compared with proPSA alone concerning GS upgrading, extraprostatic extension and surgical margins in both the total and the AS patient group. CONCLUSION: We showed in a multicenter study that proPSA is a valuable biomarker to detect patients with aggressive PCa in a cohort of GS 6 patients, who would benefit from active tumor therapy. Combining proPSA with the standard markers PSA and fPSA using PHI further increases the predictive accuracy significantly. Moreover, our data support the use of PHI for monitoring PCa patients under AS.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 275
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, UROL ONCOL
[2]   Tyrol Prostate Cancer Demonstration Project: Early detection, treatment, outcome, incidence and mortality [J].
Bartsch, Georg ;
Horninger, Wolfgang ;
Klocker, Helmut ;
Pelzer, Alexandre ;
Bektic, Jasmin ;
Oberaigner, Wilhelm ;
Schennach, Harald ;
Schaefer, Georg ;
Frauscher, Ferdinand ;
Boniol, Mathieu ;
Severi, Gianluca ;
Robertson, Chris ;
Boyle, Peter .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (07) :809-816
[3]   Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines [J].
Bruinsma, Sophie M. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Leapman, Michael S. ;
Rannikko, Antti ;
Petrides, Neophytos ;
Weerakoon, Mahesha ;
Bokhorst, Leonard P. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (03) :151-167
[4]   Use of percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to identify men at high risk of prostate cancer when PSA levels are 2.51 to 4 ng/mL and digital rectal examination is not suspicious for prostate cancer: An alternative model [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Partin, AW ;
Finlay, JA ;
Chan, DW ;
Rittenhouse, HG ;
Wolfert, RL ;
Woodrum, DL .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (02) :220-224
[5]   Prostate Health Index and %p2PSA Predict Aggressive Prostate Cancer Pathology in Chinese Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung ;
Lai, Fernand Mac-Moune ;
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun ;
Lee, Wai-Man ;
Yee, Chi-Hang ;
Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin ;
Hou, See-Ming ;
Ng, Chi-Fai .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (08) :2707-2714
[6]   Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Filella, Xavier ;
Gimenez, Nuria .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 51 (04) :729-739
[7]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Frye, Thomas P. ;
George, Arvin K. ;
Kilchevsky, Amichai ;
Maruf, Mahir ;
Siddiqui, M. Minhaj ;
Kongnyuy, Michael ;
Muthigi, Akhil ;
Han, Hui ;
Parnes, Howard L. ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Brad ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (03) :640-646
[8]   Magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates with low-risk prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis [J].
Guo, R. ;
Cai, L. ;
Fan, Y. ;
Jin, J. ;
Zhou, L. ;
Zhang, K. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2015, 18 (03) :221-228
[9]   Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. [J].
Haese A. ;
Graefen M. ;
Huland H. ;
Lilja H. .
Current Urology Reports, 2004, 5 (3) :231-240
[10]   [-2]proPSA is an early marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness [J].
Heidegger, I. ;
Klocker, H. ;
Steiner, E. ;
Skradski, V. ;
Ladurner, M. ;
Pichler, R. ;
Schaefer, G. ;
Horninger, W. ;
Bektic, J. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2014, 17 (01) :70-74