Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair

被引:100
|
作者
Friedman, Richard J. [1 ]
Flurin, Pierre-Henri [2 ]
Wright, Thomas W. [3 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [4 ]
Roche, Christopher P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Orthopaed, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Clin Sport Bordeaux Merignac, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Exactech, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Shoulder; arthroplasty; reverse; subscapularis; dislocation; complications; CUFF TEAR ARTHRITIS; REVISION ARTHROPLASTY; FRACTURE SEQUELAE; PROSTHESIS; DISLOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Repair of the subscapularis with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is controversial. The purpose of this study is to quantify rTSA outcomes in patients with and without subscapularis repair to determine if there is any impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Three hundred forty patients received rTSA and had the subscapularis repaired, whereas 251 patients received rTSA and did not have the subscapularis repaired. The patients were scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using the Simple Shoulder Test; University of California, Los Angeles; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Constant; and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index metrics. Motion was also measured. Mean follow-up was 37 months. Results: All patients showed significant improvements in pain and function after treatment with rTSA. For both cohorts, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores significantly improved, as did range of motion. The repaired cohort had significantly higher postoperative scores as measured by 4 of the 5 metrics and significantly more internal rotation, whereas the non-repaired cohort had significantly more active abduction and passive external rotation. The complication rate was 7.4% (0% dislocations) for the subscapularis-repaired cohort and 6.8% (1.2% dislocations) for the non-subscapularis-repaired cohort. Conclusions: Significant clinical improvements were observed for both the subscapularis-repaired and non-repaired cohorts, with some statistical differences observed using a variety of outcome measures. Repair of the subscapularis did not lead to inferior clinical outcomes as predicted by biomechanical models. No difference was noted in the complication or scapular notching rates between cohorts. These clinical results show that rTSA using a lateralized humeral prosthesis delivers reliable clinical improvements with a low risk of instability, regardless of subscapularis repair. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 668
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2009, 22 (02) : 172 - 182
  • [32] The effect of subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty depends on the design of the implant: a comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up
    Mocini, Fabrizio
    Cerciello, Simone
    Corona, Katia
    Morris, Brent J.
    Saturnino, Luca
    Giordano, Matthew C.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [33] Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Cheung, Emilie V.
    Sarkissian, Eric J.
    Sox-Harris, Alex
    Comer, Garet C.
    Saleh, Jason R.
    Diaz, Robert
    Costouros, John G.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (11) : 1946 - 1952
  • [34] Comparison of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with inflammatory arthritis
    Garcia, Jose Rafael
    Cannon, Dylan
    Rodriguez, Hugo C.
    Grewal, Gagan
    Lewis, Steven
    Lapica, Hans
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (03) : 573 - 580
  • [35] The effect of subscapularis repair on dislocation rates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Matthewson, Graeme
    Kooner, Sahil
    Kwapisz, Adam
    Leiter, Jeff
    Old, Jason
    MacDonald, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (05) : 989 - 997
  • [36] Subscapularis Repair After Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Cagle, Paul J., Jr.
    Shukla, Dave R.
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Flatow, Evan L.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 16 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [37] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures
    Lo, Eddie Y.
    Rizkalla, James
    Montemaggi, Paolo
    Majekodunmi, Temilola
    Krishnan, Sumant G.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (08) : 1949 - 1956
  • [38] Mid-term outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Patel, Akshar V.
    White, Christopher A.
    Cirino, Carl M.
    Duey, Akiro H.
    Ranson, William A.
    Gross, Benjamin D.
    Mease, Samuel
    Galatz, Leesa M.
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Flatow, Evan L.
    Cagle, Paul J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 799 - 807
  • [39] Prostheses for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Kazley, Jillian M.
    Cole, Keegan P.
    Desai, Khusboo J.
    Zonshayn, Samuel
    Morse, Andrew S.
    Banerjee, Samik
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (02) : 107 - 118
  • [40] Revision for instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and risk factors for failure
    Melbourne, Craig
    Munassi, Steven D.
    Ayala, Giovanni
    Christmas, Kaitlyn N.
    Diaz, Miguel
    Simon, Peter
    Mighell, Mark A.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (06) : S46 - S52