Quantitative water content mapping at clinically relevant field strengths: A comparative study at 1.5 T and 3 T.

被引:46
作者
Abbas, Zaheer [1 ,2 ]
Gras, Vincent [1 ]
Moellenhoff, Klaus [1 ]
Oros-Peusquens, Ana-Maria [1 ]
Shah, Nadim Joni [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Neurosci & Med 4, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, JARA, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
Quantitative imaging; Water content; Proton density; Parametric mapping; Clinical field strength; BRAIN EDEMA DEFINITION; CEREBRAL WHITE-MATTER; IN-VIVO ESTIMATION; PROTON-DENSITY; HEPATIC-ENCEPHALOPATHY; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; NORMAL INDIVIDUALS; T-1; MEASUREMENT; TUMOR PATIENTS; RELAXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.017
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Purpose: Quantitative water content mapping in vivo using MRI is a very valuable technique to detect, monitor and understand diseases of the brain. At 1.5 T, this technology has already been successfully used, but it has only recently been applied at 3 T because of significantly increased RF field inhomogeneity at the higher field strength. To validate the technology at 3 T, we estimate and compare in vivo quantitative water content maps at 1.5 T and 3 T obtained with a protocol proposed recently for 3 T MRI. Methods: The proposed MRI protocol was applied on twenty healthy subjects at 1.5 T and 3 T; the same post-processing algorithms were used to estimate the water contentmaps. The 1.5 T and 3 T maps were subsequently aligned and compared on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Statistical analysis was performed to detect possible differences between the estimated 1.5 T and 3 T water maps. Results: Our analysis indicates that the water content values obtained at 1.5 T and 3 T did not show significant systematic differences. On average the difference did not exceed the standard deviation of the water content at 1.5 T. Furthermore, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the estimated water content map was increased at 3 T by a factor of at least 1.5. Conclusions: Vulnerability to RF inhomogeneity increases dramatically with the increasing static magnetic field strength. However, using advanced corrections for the sensitivity profile of the MR coils, it is possible to preserve quantitative accuracy while benefiting from the increased CNR at the higher field strength. Indeed, there was no significant difference in the water content values obtained in the brain at 1.5 T and 3 T. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 413
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abbas Z., 2014, P ISMRM, P1896
[2]   Analysis of Proton-Density Bias Corrections Based on T1 Measurement for Robust Quantification of Water Content in the Brain at 3 Tesla [J].
Abbas, Zaheer ;
Gras, Vincent ;
Moellenhoff, Klaus ;
Keil, Fabian ;
Oros-Peusquens, Ana-Maria ;
Shah, Nadim J. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 72 (06) :1735-1745
[3]   Towards a molecular understanding of water homeostasis in the brain [J].
Agre, P ;
Nielsen, S ;
Ottersen, OP .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 129 (04) :849-850
[4]   The molecular basis of water transport in the brain [J].
Amiry-Moghaddam, M ;
Ottersen, OP .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 4 (12) :991-1001
[5]   In vivo estimation of water content in cerebral white matter of brain tumour patients and normal individuals: Towards a quantitative brain oedema definition [J].
Andersen C. .
Acta Neurochirurgica, 1997, 139 (3) :249-256
[6]  
Andersen C, 1997, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V139, P255
[7]   Unified segmentation [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :839-851
[8]   EVALUATION OF PROTON DENSITY BY MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING - PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS AND ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE COMPONENT PROTON TRANSVERSE RELAXATION [J].
BRIX, G ;
SCHAD, LR ;
LORENZ, WJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (01) :53-66
[9]   MR-VISIBLE WATER-CONTENT IN HUMAN BRAIN - A PROTON MRS STUDY [J].
CHRISTIANSEN, P ;
TOFT, PB ;
GIDEON, P ;
DANIELSEN, ER ;
RING, P ;
HENRIKSEN, O .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 12 (08) :1237-1244
[10]   Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation [J].
Collins, DL ;
Holmes, CJ ;
Peters, TM ;
Evans, AC .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (03) :190-208