The value of the research doctorate: A conceptual examination

被引:10
作者
Anderson, Valerie [1 ]
Gold, Jeff [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Fac Business & Law, Richmond Bldg,Portland St, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, DE, England
[2] York St John Univ, York Business Sch, York YO31 7EX, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Evaluation; Doctorates; Contribution; Impact; Management education; HIGHER-EDUCATION; STUDENTS; BUSINESS; PHD; COMPLETION; PROGRAM; PERSISTENCE; REFLECTION; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100305
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the value of doctoral studies as a form of management education. Whilst attention is paid to the value of undergraduate and taught postgraduate programmes, research degrees have received scant attention. We report an exploratory qualitative study to examine the concept of value in relation to the doctorate as described in doctoral thesis documents and by doctoral supervisors. We develop an initial conceptual model of the value of the doctorate. Our analysis identified similarities in descriptions of the value of the doctorate by doctoral supervisors with descriptions found in doctoral theses. However, analysis shows that students include personal, professional and organizational outcomes in their conceptualization of value but supervisors focus on value associated with methodological and epistemological features of knowledge generation. Management educators are expected to attend to research impact and applied outcomes. This study suggests a lack of equivalence between value attributed to the doctorate by students and the value articulated by supervisors. We contend that current norms in doctoral education privilege the assumptions of the academic community at the expense of the practice community. We argue that a wider conceptual definition of the value of the doctorate to recognize applied, personal and organizational outcomes is required.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   The Impactful Academic: Relational Management Education as an Intervention for Impact [J].
Anderson, Lisa ;
Ellwood, Paul ;
Coleman, Charlotte .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (01) :14-28
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SCI TECHN IND SCOR 2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, UK Quality Code for Higher Education: Advice and Guidance: Work-based Learning
[5]  
Backlund F, 2017, INT J EDUC MANAG, V31, P908, DOI 10.1108/IJEM-04-2016-0075
[6]   Becoming academic: a reflection on doctoral candidacy [J].
Bansel, Peter .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (05) :543-556
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[8]   Doctoral candidates as learners: a study of individual differences in responses to learning and its management [J].
Cantwell, Robert H. ;
Bourke, Sid F. ;
Scevak, Jill J. ;
Holbrook, Allyson P. ;
Budd, Janene .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (01) :47-64
[9]   The Nature of Knowledge in Business Schools [J].
Chia, Robert ;
Holt, Robin .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2008, 7 (04) :471-486
[10]  
Clarke GE, 2013, ANTIGONISH REV, P23