共 26 条
ULTRASOUND VERSUS MRI IN COMMON FIBULAR NEUROPATHY
被引:21
作者:
Bignotti, Bianca
[1
]
Assini, Andrea
[2
]
Signori, Alessio
[1
]
Martinoli, Carlo
[1
]
Tagliafico, Alberto
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci DISSAL, Genoa, Italy
[2] Ente Osped Osped Galliera, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Inst Anat, Dept Expt Med DIMES, Via LB Alberti 2, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
关键词:
fibular nerve;
magnetic resonance imaging;
sensitivity;
specificity;
ultrasound;
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA;
PERIPHERAL-NERVE PATHOLOGY;
EXTREMITY NERVES;
ULNAR NERVE;
NEUROGRAPHY;
RELIABILITY;
PARAMETER;
ELBOW;
HEAD;
D O I:
10.1002/mus.25418
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction: We prospectively compared ultrasound (US) and MRI in patients with common fibular neuropathy. Methods: Forty adult patients with clinical suspicion of common fibular neuropathy and 40 healthy controls underwent both US and MRI. US and MRI datasets were randomized for prospective reading. Results: The overall sensitivity of US and MRI for diagnosing fibular neuropathy was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.7%-97.3%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 71.55%-93.1%), respectively. The overall specificity of US and MRI was 92% (95% CI, 77.45%-96.1%) and 85% (95% CI, 73.3%94.4%), respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of US combined with MRI were 94% (95% CI, 0.80%-0.99%) and 84% (95% CI, 0.70%-0.91%), respectively. Overall intra-and inter-observer agreements among 3 readers were 0.76% (95% CI, 0.62%-0.85%) and 0.74% (95% CI, 0.65%-0.81%). Conclusions: US diagnostic accuracy for common fibular neuropathy was slightly higher than that of MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 857
页数:9
相关论文