Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for pain, Constant-Murley score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with subacromial pain syndrome

被引:25
作者
Kanto, Kari [1 ]
Lahdeoja, Tuomas [2 ,3 ]
Paavola, Mika [2 ,3 ]
Aronen, Pasi [4 ,5 ]
Jarvinen, Teppo L. N. [2 ,3 ]
Jokihaara, Jarkko [6 ]
Ardern, Clare L. [7 ]
Karjalainen, Teemu V. [8 ]
Taimela, Simo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp, TAYS Hatanpaa, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Orthopaed FICEBO, Hatanpaankatu 24, Tampere 33900, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Orthopaed FICEBO, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[3] Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Biostat Unit, Tukholmankatu 8B, Helsinki 00290, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Tukholmankatu 8B, Helsinki 00290, Finland
[6] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Hand & Microsurg, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Orthopaed FICEBO, Elamanaukio 2, Tampere 33520, Finland
[7] Karolinska Inst, Div Physiotherapy, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Orthopaed FICEBO, H1 Fysioterapi, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Cent Finland Cent Hosp, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Orthopaed FICEBO, Keskussairaalantie 19, Jyvaskyla 40620, Finland
关键词
Clinimetrics; minimal important change; MID; MCID; patient accepted symptom state; PASS; responsiveness; Outcome measures; Visual analogue scale (VAS); Simple shoulder test; Constant-Murley score; Pain; Subacromial pain;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-021-01241-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The results of clinical trials should be assessed for both statistical significance and importance of observed effects to patients. Minimal important difference (MID) is a threshold denoting a difference that is important to patients. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a threshold above which patients feel well. Objective: To determine MID and PASS for common outcome instruments in patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). Methods: We used data from the FIMPACT trial, a randomised controlled trial of treatment for SAPS that included 193 patients. The outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity, both measured with the 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), the Constant-Murley score (CS), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). The transition question was a five-point global rating of change. We used three anchor-based methods to determine the MID for improvement: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the mean difference of change and the mean change methods. For the PASS, we used the ROC and 75th percentile methods and calculated estimates using two different anchor question thresholds. Results: Different MID methods yielded different estimates. The ROC method yielded the smallest estimates for MID: 20 mm for shoulder pain on arm activity, 10 points for CS and 1.5 points for SST, with good to excellent discrimination (areas under curve (AUCs) from 0.86 to 0.94). We could not establish a reliable MID for pain at rest. The PASS estimates were consistent between methods. The ROC method PASS thresholds using a conservative anchor question threshold were 2 mm for pain at rest, 9 mm for pain on activity, 80 points for CS and 11 points for SST, with AUCs from 0.74 to 0.83. Conclusion: We recommend the smallest estimate from different methods as the MID, because it is very unlikely that changes smaller than the smallest MID estimate are important to patients: 20 mm for pain VAS on arm activity, 10 points for CS and 1.5 points for SST. We recommend PASS estimates of 9 mm for pain on arm activity, 80 points for CS, and 11 points for SST.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Identification of Shoulder-specific Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Shoulder Surgery
    Christie, Anne
    Dagfinrud, Hanne
    Garratt, Andrew M.
    Osnes, Hanne Ringen
    Hagen, Kare Birger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2011, 24 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [2] CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
  • [3] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses A Systematic Review
    Dabija, Dominique I.
    Jain, Nitin B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2019, 98 (08) : 671 - 676
  • [4] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [5] Mind the methods of determining minimal important differences: three critical issues to consider
    Devji, Tahira
    Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
    Guyatt, Gordon
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 24 (02) : 77 - 81
  • [6] Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
    Devji, Tahira
    Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
    Qasim, Anila
    Phillips, Mark
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    Devasenapathy, Niveditha
    Zeraatkar, Dena
    Bhatt, Meha
    Jin, Xuejing
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Urquhart, Olivia
    Foroutan, Farid
    Schandelmaier, Stefan
    Pardo-Hernandez, Hector
    Vernooij, Robin W. M.
    Huang, Hsiaomin
    Rizwan, Yamna
    Siemieniuk, Reed
    Lytvyn, Lyubov
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Ebrahim, Shanil
    Furukawa, Toshi
    Nesrallah, Gihad
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Thabane, Lehana
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 369
  • [7] Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform BMJ Rapid Recommendations
    Devji, Tahira
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Lytvyn, Lyubov
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Foroutan, Farid
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    Harris, Ian A.
    Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
    Siemieniuk, Reed A. C.
    Vandvik, Per O.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (05):
  • [8] Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    Farrar, JT
    Young, JP
    LaMoreaux, L
    Werth, JL
    Poole, RM
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [9] Using ROC Curves to Choose Minimally Important Change Thresholds when Sensitivity and Specificity Are Valued Equally: The Forgotten Lesson of Pythagoras. Theoretical Considerations and an Example Application of Change in Health Status
    Froud, Robert
    Abel, Gary
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [10] A critical look at transition ratings
    Guyatt, GH
    Norman, GR
    Juniper, EF
    Griffith, LE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (09) : 900 - 908