Simulation of potential habitat overlap between red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in northeastern China

被引:28
作者
Wu, Wen [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yuehui [1 ]
Hu, Yuanman [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, State Key Lab Forest & Soil Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Species distribution model (SDM); MaxEnt; Habitat overlap; Anthropogenic disturbance; Deer management; Northeastern China; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; POPULATION VIABILITY; CONSERVATION STATUS; SIBERIAN TIGER; BIODIVERSITY; FRAGMENTATION; ROADS; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.1756
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Understanding species distribution, especially areas of overlapping habitat between sympatric species, is essential for informing conservation through natural habitat protection. New protection strategies should simultaneously consider conservation efforts for multiple species that exist within the same landscape, which requires studies that include habitat overlap analysis. Methods. We estimated the potential habitat of cervids, which are typical ungulates in northern China, using the present locations of red deer (Cervus elaphus; N = 90) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus; N = 106) in a Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model. Our study area was a human-dominated landscape in the Tieli Forestry the southern slope of the Lesser Xing'an Mountains. We grouped Bureau located at 17 environmental predictor variables into five predictor classes (terrain, habitat accessibility, land cover, vegetation feature, and interference), which were used to build habitat suitability models. Results. Habiat accessibility and human interferences were found to have the strongest. influence on habitat suitability among the five variable classes. Among the environmental factor, distance to farmland (26.8%), distance to bush-grass land (14.6%), elevation (13.5%), and distance to water source (12.2%) were most important for red deer, distance to farmland (22.9%), distance to settlement (21.4%), elevation (11.6%), and coverage of shrub-grass (8%) were most important for roe deer. Model accuracy was high for both species (mean area under the curve (AUC) = 0.936 for red deer and 0.924 for roe deer). The overlapping habitat comprised 89.93 km(2) within the study area, which occupied 94 A. of potentially suitable habitat for red deer and 27% for roe deer. Conclusions. In terms of habitat suitability, roe deer showed greater selectivity than red deer. The overlapping habitat was mostly located in the eastern mountains. The southwestern plain was not a suitable habitat for deer because it was close to Tieli Qty. Regarding management measures, we suggest that priority protection should be given to the potential areas of overlapping deer habitats found in this study.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Climate change threatens European conservation areas [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Alagador, Diogo ;
Cabeza, Mar ;
Nogues-Bravo, David ;
Thuiller, Wilfried .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 14 (05) :484-492
[2]   Spatial risk model and mitigation implications for wolf-human conflict in a highly modified agroecosystem in western Iran [J].
Behdarvand, Neda ;
Kaboli, Mohammad ;
Ahmadi, Mohsen ;
Nourani, Elham ;
Mahini, Abdolrassoul Salman ;
Aghbolaghi, Marzieh Asadi .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 177 :156-164
[3]   Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer [J].
Bonnot, Nadege ;
Morellet, Nicolas ;
Verheyden, Helene ;
Cargnelutti, Bruno ;
Lourtet, Bruno ;
Klein, Francois ;
Hewison, A. J. Mark .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 59 (02) :185-193
[4]   Modelling distribution of habitats required for different uses by the same species: Implications for conservation at the regional scale [J].
Brambilla, Mattia ;
Saporetti, Fabio .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 174 :39-46
[5]   SDMtoolbox: a python']python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses [J].
Brown, Jason L. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (07) :694-700
[6]   Modeling and mapping wildfire ignition risk in Portugal [J].
Catry, Filipe X. ;
Rego, Francisco C. ;
Bacao, Fernando ;
Moreira, Francisco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2009, 18 (08) :921-931
[7]   Future of Endemic Flora of Biodiversity Hotspots in India [J].
Chitale, Vishwas Sudhir ;
Behera, Mukund Dev ;
Roy, Partha Sarthi .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12)
[8]   Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot [J].
Costa, Gabriel C. ;
Nogueira, Cristiano ;
Machado, Ricardo B. ;
Colli, Guarino R. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (03) :883-899
[9]   Factors determining the abundance and occurrence of Hermann's tortoise Testudo hermanni in France and Spain: Fire regime and landscape changes as the main drivers [J].
Couturier, Thibaut ;
Besnard, Aurelien ;
Bertolero, Albert ;
Bosc, Valerie ;
Astruc, Guillelme ;
Cheylan, Marc .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 170 :177-187
[10]   Assessing the conservation status of species with limited available data and disjunct distribution [J].
de Castro Pena, Joao Carlos ;
Yoshino Kamino, Luciana Hiromi ;
Rodrigues, Marcos ;
Mariano-Neto, Eduardo ;
de Siqueira, Marinez Ferreira .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 170 :130-136