Effect of local anesthesia and intravenous sedation on pain perception and vasovagal reactions during femoral arterial sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:20
作者
Ang, Choon Kiat
Leung, Dominic Y. C.
Lo, Sidney
French, John K.
Juergens, Craig P.
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Liverpool, NSW 1871, Australia
[2] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Kuching, Malaysia
关键词
percutaneous coronary intervention; sheath; pain; sedation; analgesia;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.04.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is no consensus with respect to the use of analgesia during femoral arterial sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of intravenous sedation and local anesthesia during femoral sheath removal after PCI on patient comfort and the incidence of vasovagal reactions. Methods: All patients undergoing PCI whose femoral sheaths were to be removed with assisted manual compression were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous sedation (Fentanyl and Midazolam) or local anesthesia (1% lignocaine) infiltrated around the sheath site or both or neither. The primary endpoint of the study was the patients reported worst pain according to a Visual Analogue scale (VAS) after sheath removal. The incidence and predictors of vasovagal reactions during sheath removal and occurrence of vascular complications was also determined. Results: A total of 611 patients were randomized into this study. The mean pain score was highest in the local anesthesia only arm as compared to the sedation only arm, the combined local and sedation arm and the neither sedation or local arm (p = 0.001). vasovagal reactions were experienced by 35 patients (5.1%) with the highest percentage in the local anesthesia only group (9.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a higher pain score (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.24, p = 0.001), use of glyceryl trinitrate during sheath removal (OR 9.05, 95% CI 5.06-16. 1, p < 0.001), a lower body mass index (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.18, p = 0.009) and the left anterior descending artery as the treated vessel (OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.41-7.87, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of the occurrence of a vasovagal reaction. There was no significant difference in vascular complications between the 4 study groups. Conclusions: The routine use of fentanyl and midazolam prior to sheath removal leads to a reduction in pain perception and vasovagal incidence, whilst the routine use of local infiltration during sheath removal should be discouraged as it leads to more pain and a trend to more vasovagal reactions. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 326
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the angio-seal device vs. the femostop device [J].
Amin, FR ;
Yousufuddin, M ;
Stables, R ;
Shamim, W ;
Al-Nasser, F ;
Coats, AJS ;
Clague, J ;
Sigwart, U .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 76 (2-3) :235-240
[2]   Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization [J].
Applegate, RJ ;
Grabarczyk, MA ;
Little, WC ;
Craven, T ;
Walkup, M ;
Kahl, FR ;
Braden, GA ;
Rankin, KM ;
Kutcher, MA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (01) :78-83
[3]  
Barbiere C C, 1994, Crit Care Nurse, V14, P90
[4]  
Boss B J, 1988, J Neurosci Nurs, V20, P245
[5]  
Bowden S M, 1995, Am J Crit Care, V4, P368
[6]   Role of nitric oxide in the regulation of cardiovascular autonomic control [J].
Chowdhary, S ;
Townend, JN .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 97 (01) :5-17
[7]  
Fulton T R, 2000, Am J Crit Care, V9, P125
[8]   Gender, interpersonal transactions, and the perception of pain: An experimental analysis [J].
Jackson, T ;
Iezzi, T ;
Chen, H ;
Ebnet, S ;
Eglitis, K .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 6 (04) :228-236
[9]   PERIPHERAL VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS OF CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY BY THE FEMORAL AND BRACHIAL TECHNIQUES [J].
JOHNSON, LW ;
ESENTE, P ;
GIAMBARTOLOMEI, A ;
GRANT, WD ;
LOIN, M ;
REGER, MJ ;
SHAW, C ;
WALFORD, GD .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 31 (03) :165-172
[10]   Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention [J].
Juergens, CP ;
Leung, DYC ;
Crozier, JA ;
Wong, AM ;
Robinson, JTC ;
Lo, S ;
Kachwalla, H ;
Hopkins, AP .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (02) :166-170