The Role of Tactile Stimulation for Expectation, Perceived Treatment Assignment and the Placebo Effect in an Experimental Nausea Paradigm

被引:7
作者
Aichner, Simone [1 ]
Haile, Anja [1 ]
Hoffmann, Verena [1 ]
Olliges, Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Tschoep, Matthias H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Meissner, Karin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Fac Med, Inst Med Psychol, Munich, Germany
[2] Coburg Univ Appl Sci, Div Hlth Promot, Coburg, Germany
[3] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Helmholtz Diabet Ctr, Inst Diabet & Obes, Munich, Germany
[4] German Ctr Diabet Res DZD, Munich, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Med, Div Metab Dis, Munich, Germany
关键词
placebo effect; expectation; nausea; motion sickness; tactile stimulation; acupuncture; ACUPUNCTURE; RESPONSES; TRIALS; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2019.01212
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction Tactile stimulation during a placebo treatment could enhance its credibility and thereby boost positive treatment expectations and the placebo effect. This experimental study aimed to investigate the interplay between tactile stimulation, expectation, and treatment credibility for the placebo effect in nausea. Methods Ninety healthy participants were exposed to a 20-min vection stimulus on two separate days and were randomly allocated to one of three groups on the second day after the baseline period: Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with tactile stimulation (n = 30), placebo TENS without tactile stimulation (n = 30), or no intervention (n = 30). Placebo TENS was performed for 20 min at a dummy acupuncture point on both forearms. Expected and perceived nausea severity and further symptoms of motion sickness were assessed at baseline and during the evaluation period. At the end of the experiment, participants in the placebo groups guessed whether they had received active or placebo treatment. Results Expected nausea decreased significantly more in the placebo groups as compared to the no treatment control group (interaction day x group, F = 6.60, p = 0.003, partial eta(2) = 0.20), with equal reductions in the two placebo groups (p = 1.0). Reduced expectation went along with a significant placebo effect on nausea (interaction day x group, F = 22.2, p < 0.001, partial eta(2) = 0.35) with no difference between the two placebo groups (p = 1.0). Twenty-three out of 29 participants in the tactile placebo group (79%) but only 14 out of 30 participants (47%) in the non-tactile placebo group believed that they had received the active intervention (p = 0.015). Bang's blinding index (BI) indicated random guessing in the non-tactile placebo group (BI = 0; 95% CI, -0.35 to 0.35) and non-random guessing in the direction of an "opposite guess" in the tactile placebo group (BI = -0.52; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.22). Conclusion Tactile stimulation during placebo TENS did not further enhance positive treatment expectations and the placebo effect in nausea but increased the credibility of the intervention. Further trials should investigate the interaction between perceived treatment assignment, expectation, and the placebo effect during the course of a trial.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Bang H., 2010, CLIN RES REGUL AFF, V27, P42, DOI DOI 10.3109/10601331003777444
  • [2] Placebo-responsive Parkinson patients show decreased activity in single neurons of subthalamic nucleus
    Benedetti, F
    Colloca, L
    Torre, E
    Lanotte, M
    Melcarne, A
    Pesare, M
    Bergamasco, B
    Lopiano, L
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 7 (06) : 587 - 588
  • [3] Interaction between expectancies and drug effects: an experimental investigation of placebo analgesia with caffeine as an active placebo
    Bjorkedal, Espen
    Flaten, Magne Arve
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 215 (03) : 537 - 548
  • [4] Challenges of differential placebo effects in contemporary medicine: The example of brain stimulation
    Burke, Matthew J.
    Kaptchuk, Ted J.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2019, 85 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [5] Campbell Anthony, 2006, Acupunct Med, V24, P169
  • [6] How Placebo Needles Differ From Placebo Pills?
    Chae, Younbyoung
    Lee, Ye-Seul
    Enck, Paul
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 9
  • [7] How placebo responses are formed: a learning perspective
    Colloca, Luana
    Miller, Franklin G.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 366 (1572) : 1859 - 1869
  • [8] Expectation and dopamine release:: Mechanism of the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease
    de la Fuente-Fernández, R
    Ruth, TJ
    Sossi, V
    Schulzer, M
    Calne, DB
    Stoessl, AJ
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5532) : 1164 - 1166
  • [9] RETRACTED: Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting (Retracted Article)
    Ezzo, J. M.
    Richardson, M. A.
    Vickers, A.
    Allen, C.
    Dibble, S. L.
    Issell, B. F.
    Lao, L.
    Pearl, M.
    Ramirez, G.
    Roscoe, J. A.
    Shen, J.
    Shivnan, J. C.
    Streitberger, K.
    Treish, I.
    Zhang, G.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (02):
  • [10] The Cognitive Neuroscience of Placebo Effects: Concepts, Predictions, and Physiology
    Geuter, Stephan
    Koban, Leonie
    Wager, Tor D.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, VOL 40, 2017, 40 : 167 - 188