Helioseismological implications of recent solar abundance determinations

被引:241
作者
Bahcall, JN
Basu, S
Pinsonneault, M
Serenelli, AM
机构
[1] Inst Adv Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Astron, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Astron, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Sun : abundances; Sun : helioseismology; Sun : interior; Sun : oscillations;
D O I
10.1086/426070
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We show that standard solar models are in good agreement with the helioseismologically determined sound speed and density as a function of solar radius, the depth of the convective zone, and the surface helium abundance, as long as those models do not incorporate the most recent heavy-element abundance determinations. However, sophisticated new analyses of the solar atmosphere infer lower abundances of the lighter metals (like C, N, O, Ne, and Ar) than the previously widely used surface abundances. We show that solar models that include the lower heavy-element abundances disagree with the solar profiles of sound speed and density as well as the depth of the convective zone and the helium abundance. The disagreements for models with the new abundances range from factors of several to many times the quoted uncertainties in the helioseismological measurements. The disagreements are at temperatures that are too low to affect significantly solar neutrino emission. If errors in the calculated OPAL opacities are solely responsible for the disagreements, then the corrections in the opacity must extend from 2 x 10(6) K (R = 0.7 R-circle dot) to 5 x 10(6) K (R = 0.4 R-circle dot), with opacity increases of the order of 10%.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1056
页数:8
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Measurement of the rate of νe+d →p+p+e- interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the sudbury neutrino observatory -: art. no. 071301
    Ahmad, QR
    Allen, RC
    Andersen, TC
    Anglin, JD
    Bühler, G
    Barton, JC
    Beier, EW
    Bercovitch, M
    Bigu, J
    Biller, S
    Black, RA
    Blevis, I
    Boardman, RJ
    Boger, J
    Bonvin, E
    Boulay, MG
    Bowler, MG
    Bowles, TJ
    Brice, SJ
    Browne, MC
    Bullard, TV
    Burritt, TH
    Cameron, K
    Cameron, J
    Chan, YD
    Chen, M
    Chen, HH
    Chen, X
    Chon, MC
    Cleveland, BT
    Clifford, ETH
    Cowan, JHM
    Cowen, DF
    Cox, GA
    Dai, Y
    Dai, X
    Dalnoki-Veress, F
    Davidson, WF
    Doe, PJ
    Doucas, G
    Dragowsky, MR
    Duba, CA
    Duncan, FA
    Dunmore, J
    Earle, ED
    Elliott, SR
    Evans, HC
    Ewan, GT
    Farine, J
    Fergani, H
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 87 (07) : 71301 - 1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, THEORY SOLAR OSCILLA
  • [3] Antia HM, 1998, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V339, P239
  • [4] ANTIA HM, 1994, ASTRON ASTROPHYS SUP, V107, P421
  • [5] Line formation in solar granulation - IV. [O I], OI and OH lines and the photospheric O abundance
    Asplund, M
    Grevesse, N
    Sauval, AJ
    Prieto, CA
    Kiselman, D
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2004, 417 (02) : 751 - 768
  • [6] Asplund M, 2000, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V359, P743
  • [7] Asplund M, 2000, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V359, P755
  • [8] SOLAR MODELS, NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS, AND HELIOSEISMOLOGY
    BAHCALL, JN
    ULRICH, RK
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1988, 60 (02) : 297 - 372
  • [9] What do we (not) know theoretically about solar neutrino fluxes?
    Bahcall, JN
    Pinsonneault, MH
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 92 (12) : 121301 - 1
  • [10] How accurately can we calculate the depth of the solar convective zone?
    Bahcall, JN
    Serenelli, AM
    Pinsonneault, M
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 614 (01) : 464 - 471